Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVarvin, Sverre
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-13T11:45:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T07:19:36Z
dc.date.available2020-05-13T11:45:51Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T07:19:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.identifier.citationVarvin S: Extreme Traumatization: Conceptualization and Treatment from the Perspective of Object-Relations and Modern Research. In: Huppertz. Approaches to Psychic Trauma. Theory and Practice, 2019. Rowman & Littlefield International p. 307-321en
dc.identifier.isbn9781442258143
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/8600
dc.description.abstractIn the last century civilians increasingly became targets in wars, totalitarian regimes and internal wars. This trend continues into this century. The basic unity in all societies, the family in its different forms, is thus increasingly under attack in these war zones, with serious consequences for the mental health and the development of its members. Responses to Traumatization The accepted use of trauma concepts is highly problematic. The word “trauma” implies something static and reified, like a “thing” in the mind, and this usage tends to divert attention towards the dynamic and reorganizing processes in the traumatized person’s mind, body and relations to others that happens after being exposed to atrocities. These are processes that depend on the level of personality organization, on past traumatizing experiences, on the circumstances during atrocities and, most importantly, on the context that meets the survivor afterwards. It is the person’s responses to atrocity as well as the responses of others and of societies as a whole that to a large degree determine the fate of the traumatized person and her group. Research has convincingly confirmed the importance of the response to the traumatized afterwards, beginning with Hans Keilson’s seminal work on Jewish children survivors after the second world war and also later researches (Gagnon and Stewart 2013; Keilson and Sarpathie 1979; Simich and Andermann 2014; Ungar 2012). Psychoanalysis is one such societal response, both in its practical therapeutic form and as a comprehensive theory for understanding the mind’s relation to the body and the general context of the trauma.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRowman & Littlefield Internationalen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesApproaches to Psychic Trauma. Theory and Practice;
dc.relation.urihttps://rowman.com/ISBN/9781442258167/Approaches-to-Psychic-Trauma-Theory-and-Practice
dc.rightsDen aksepterte postprint-versjonen av kapittelet er tillatt å egenarkivere i institusjonelle arkiv, se https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1i44kKzsFS412ugDTt0maanAUqy8LV5Rjj820dVkK9vs/edit#gid=1128790495.en
dc.subjectTraumatizationen
dc.subjectTreatmentsen
dc.subjectPersonality organizationsen
dc.subjectTraumatizing experiencesen
dc.subjectSocietal responsesen
dc.subjectPsychoanalysesen
dc.titleExtreme Traumatization: Conceptualization and Treatment from the Perspective of Object-Relations and Modern Researchen
dc.typeChapteren
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-05-13T11:45:51Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.identifier.cristin1650713
dc.source.isbn9781442258143


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel