dc.contributor.author | Egerod, Ingrid | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaldan, Gudrun | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindahl, Berit | |
dc.contributor.author | Hansen, Britt Sætre | |
dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Janet Froulund | |
dc.contributor.author | Collet, Marie Oxenbøll | |
dc.contributor.author | Halvorsen, Kristin | |
dc.contributor.author | Eriksson, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Olausson, Sepideh | |
dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Hanne Irene | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-31T16:46:12Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-22T21:59:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-31T16:46:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-22T21:59:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Egerod I, Kaldan, Lindahl B, Hansen BS, Jensen, Collet, Halvorsen KH, Eriksson T, Olausson S, Jensen HI. Trends and recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries: Triangulation of review and survey data. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2019 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0964-3397 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0964-3397 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-4036 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8302 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Priorities for critical care nursing research have evolved with societal trends and values. In the 1980s priorities were the nursing workforce, in 1990s technical nursing, in 2000s evidence-based nursing and in 2010s symptom management and family-centred care.
Objectives: To identify current trends and future recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries.
Methods: We triangulated the results of a literature review and a survey. A review of two selected critical care nursing journals (2016–2017) was conducted using content analysis to identify contemporary published research. A self-administered computerised cross-sectional survey of Nordic critical care nursing researchers (2017) reported current and future areas of research.
Results: A review of 156 papers identified research related to the patient (13%), family (12%), nurse (31%), and therapies (44%). Current trends in the survey (n = 76, response rate 65%) included patient and family involvement, nurse performance and education, and evidence-based protocols. The datasets showed similar trends, but aftercare was only present in the survey. Future trends included symptom management, transitions, rehabilitation, and new nursing roles.
Conclusion: Critical care nursing research is trending toward increased collaboration with patient and family, delineating a shift toward user values. Recommendations include long-term outcomes and impact of nursing. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Intensive and Critical Care Nursing;Volume 56 | |
dc.subject | Critical care nursing | en |
dc.subject | Intensive care units | en |
dc.subject | Surveys | en |
dc.subject | Research priorities | en |
dc.subject | Reviews | en |
dc.title | Trends and recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries: Triangulation of review and survey data | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2020-01-31T16:46:12Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2019.102765 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1759249 | |
dc.source.journal | Intensive & Critical Care Nursing | |