Assessing mobility for persons with lower limb amputation: the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with the inclusion of two novel conditions
Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionSchack J, Mirtaheri PM, Steen H, Gjøvaag T. Assessing mobility for persons with lower limb amputation: the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with the inclusion of two novel conditions. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019:1-10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1662495
Purpose: To investigate the internal consistency, convergent and known-groups construct validity of the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with two novel conditions in persons with lower limb amputation, and to examine differences in walking performance between the three conditions within a group of persons with transtibial amputation and transfemoral amputation/knee disarticulation. Materials and methods: Fifty adults with unilateral amputation participated, 28 of whom had undergone a transtibial amputation and 22 a transfemoral amputation/knee disarticulation. Three Figure-of-Eight Walk Test conditions were investigated: 1) walking at a self-selected walking speed, 2) walking while carrying a tray with two cups of water, and 3) walking on uneven terrain. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Convergent construct validity was examined by analysing the relationship between the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test parameters and performance-based parameters (Amputee Mobility Predictor, Ten-Meter Walk Test, Six-Minute Walk Test) and self-report measures (Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale) using Spearman’s rank-order correlations. Known-groups construct validity was assessed by comparing the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test parameters based on anatomical level of amputation. Friedman’s test and post hoc analysis were used to examine differences between the walking conditions within each group. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test parameters for all three conditions ranged from 0.89 to 0.99. The Figure-of-Eight Walk Test time and step parameters demonstrated moderate to good correlation (ρ = −0.50 to −0.77) for performance-based mobility measures. The correlations were stronger during Condition 3 in comparison with the original Figure-of-Eight Walk Test. The correlation was fair to good (ρ = −0.41 to −0.57) for the self-report mobility measures. Comparison between groups showed a difference between transtibial and transfemoral amputation/knee disarticulation participants when it comes to the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test time and smoothness parameters in Condition 2 (p < 0.05). Comparison between walking conditions within each group showed significant differences in the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test parameters in the two novel conditions in comparison with the original Figure-of-Eight Walk Test. The Figure-of-Eight Walk Test and the novel conditions demonstrated excellent internal consistency, good convergent construct validity, and evidence of known-groups construct validity. Future studies should further develop and standardise the smoothness scale to better quantify walking performance and assess the responsiveness and reliability (inter-rater and intra-rater) of the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test (time and steps) and the novel conditions, while studies on known-groups validity should include persons with a wider mobility range.