The impact of pitch values on image quality and radiation dose in an abdominal adult phantom using CT
Lança, Luis; Barros, Pietro; Løvlien, Ine M.; Derech, Rodrigo D’Agostini; Higgins, Daniel; Kleiker, Marjolein; McNally, Kevin; Thevenaz, Manon; Hogg, Peter; Liardet, Sebastien
Original version
Lança, L., Barros, P., Derech, R.D., Higgins, D., Kleiker, M., Liardet, S. & Hogg, P. (2017). The impact of pitch values on image quality and radiation dose in an abdominal adult phantom using CT. I: P. Hogg, Hogg-Thompson, R. & C. Buissink (Red.). OPTIMAX 2016 Optimising image quality for medical imaging, Manchester: University of Salford s. 105-116Abstract
Purpose: To identify the impact of different pitch values on image quality and
effective radiation dose for axial and coronal plane in abdominal adult CT.
Methods and materials: Three scans were conducted on an abdominal phantom
using a Toshiba Aquilion 16-slice CT scanner with three different pitch values:
standard (0.938), detail (0.688) and fast (1.438). Slices were taken from the upper,
middle and lower abdomen in the axial plane and anterior, middle and posterior in the coronal plane. The six different anatomical structures were liver, intrahepatic
vessels, spleen, pancreas, kidneys and renal vessels, retroperitoneum, aorta and
vena cava. A two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) method was used to evaluate
images for each pitch with 8 observers using a 3-point Likert scale. SNR was
calculated in every plane, slice and pitch factor using the ImageJ software. To
estimate effective radiation dose the CT Expo software was used.
Results: Detail pitch factor provides superior image quality compared to standard
in axial plane when evaluating the liver (p<0.034) and pancreas (p=0.008). However,
the results for spleen, kidney, renal vessels, retroperitoneum, aorta and vena
cava are not significant when comparing detail vs standard. Standard provides a
26.3% reduction in effective radiation dose (mSv) compared to detail. Fast had the
worst image quality in both the axial and coronal plane but the lowest dose. In the
coronal plane, standard was superior to both detail (p=0.026) and fast (p=0.023) in
terms of image quality. The differences in SNR results were not significant except in
standard vs detail in the coronal plane (p=0.03).
Conclusion: Detail pitch factor provides superior image quality to standard and
fast in the axial plane. Standard had superior image quality to both detail and
fast in the coronal plane. The augmentation of effective doses has been inversely
proportional to the pitch factors. The most irradiant pitch mode was detail and the
less was fast.