Ultrasound assessment of muscle thickness and muscle crosssectional area: a reliability study
Chapter, Peer reviewed
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionNijholt, Aandahl I, Adajar, Borgen MH, Carreiras, Rab, Totland H, Warmerdam N, van der Wal, Crofts: Ultrasound assessment of muscle thickness and muscle crosssectional area: a reliability study. In: Hogg P, Hogg-Thompson, Buissink C. OPTIMAX 2016Optimising image quality for medical imaging, 2017. University of Salford p. 71-82
Purpose: Previous studies showed that ultrasound imaging is reliable when measuring the cross-sectional area (CSA) of a muscle. However, measurements of muscles could be affected by the level of experience of the observer. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the reliability of observers when measuring the CSA and thickness of the rectus femoris (RF). Methods and Materials: Seven observers assessed eight different images of RF. On each image the CSA and thickness was measured three times using ImageJ. The measurements were analysed using IBM SPSS. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyse reliability. A Paired Sample T-Test was used to investigate any differences between the first and mean measurement recorded by the observers. Results: No significant differences were found between the first and mean of the repeated measures for CSA and thickness respectively (p = 0. 217- 0.817, p = 0.337-0.897). Intra-observer reliability shows excellent agreement between measurement one and the mean for each observer (CSA ICC = 0.987-1.000, thickness ICC = 0.996-1.000). High inter-observer reliability was found for both CSA (ICC = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.845-0.985) and thickness (ICC = 0.9774, 95% CI = 0.934-0.994). Agreement between an experienced and inexperienced observer was excellent (ICC = 0.991, 95% CI = 0.959-0.998). Conclusion: This pilot study shows that there is a high level of inter- and intra-observer reliability among the observers in measuring the CSA and thickness of the RF. It also shows that experience in ultrasound measurements is not a factor in reliability.