Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNijholt, Willemke
dc.contributor.authorBakker, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorBorgen, Morten Højsgård
dc.contributor.authorEllermann, Anne
dc.contributor.authorHogg, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGamboa, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorThorskog, Martine
dc.contributor.authorVorster, Liesl
dc.contributor.authorAandahl, Ingrid-Jannicke
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:04:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-13T12:08:05Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:04:38Z
dc.date.available2017-03-13T12:08:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationNijholt, Bakker A, Bennett A, Borgen MH, Ellermann A, Hogg P, Gamboa P, Thorskog M, Vorster, Aandahl I: An analysis of the validity and reliability of handheld ultrasound device for measuring rectus femoris muscle size. In: Hogg P, Blakeley, Buissink C. OPTIMAX 2015 : Multicultural team-based research in radiography, a holistic educational approach. , 2016. University of Salford p. 78-88language
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-907842-77-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/4225
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous studies show that ultrasound is valid and reliable when measuring muscle size. A Philips handheld ultrasound device was released in April 2015. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the handheld ultrasound device compared to a conventional ultrasound device, when measuring the size of the rectus femoris (RF). Methods: Two sonographers scanned 39 volunteers (mean age=29.3y, 26 female), once with the Toshiba SSA-660A (regular) ultrasound device and twice with the Philips hand held VISIQ device. The size of the RF (expressed in cross sectional area (CSA) was measured two ways; using the trackball on the Toshiba device and an automatic region of interest on the VISIQ device (method 1), and an ellipse on both devices using the formula π*half width*half length (method 2).Results: Method 1 resulted in an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of .811 with a 95% (confidence interval) CI of .773-.837 (inter-rater reliability) and .907 with a 95% CI of .822-.951 (validity). The ICCs of method 2 were .787 with a 95% CI of .593-.888 (inter-rater reliability) and .867 with a 95 % CI of .746-.930 (validity). Conclusion: VISIQ is a valid and reliable device for measuring RF-CSA. In clinical practice VISIQ could be used for measuring RF-CSA, consequently it could be an economical and easily portable technology for use in both clinical and residential settingslanguage
dc.language.isoenlanguage
dc.publisherUniversity of Salfordlanguage
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY- NC -SAlanguage
dc.subjectRectus Femorislanguage
dc.subjectReliabilitylanguage
dc.subjectUltrasoundlanguage
dc.subjectValiditylanguage
dc.subjectHandheldlanguage
dc.titleAn analysis of the validity and reliability of handheld ultrasound device for measuring rectus femoris muscle sizelanguage
dc.typePeer reviewedlanguage
dc.typeChapter
dc.date.updated2017-01-30T10:04:38Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionlanguage
dc.identifier.cristin1410114
dc.source.isbn978-1-907842-77-1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel