Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBorge, Synnøve Deviken_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Ninaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaszkowski, Aysha Malgorzataen_US
dc.contributor.authorRook, Jan Willemen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanderud, Audunen_US
dc.contributor.authorVallinga, Aniqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorVouillamoz, Audreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBuissink, Carsten_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-23T12:47:17Z
dc.date.available2016-02-23T12:47:17Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781907842603en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1239762en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/3012
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Children have a greater risk from radiation, per unit dose, due to increased radiosensitivity and longer life expectancies. It is of paramount importance to reduce the radiation dose received by children. This research concerns chest CT examinations on paediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and the dose received from imaging with images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and five strengths of Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE). Methods: Using a multi-slice CT scanner, six series of images were taken of a paediatric phantom. Two kVp values (80 and 110), 3 mAs values (25, 50 and 100) and 2 slice thicknesses (1 mm and 3 mm) were used. All images were reconstructed with FBP and five strengths of SAFIRE. Ten observers evaluated visual image quality. Dose was measured using CT-Expo. Results: FBP required a higher dose than all SAFIRE strengths to obtain the same image quality for sharpness and noise. For sharpness and contrast image quality ratings of 4, FBP required doses of 6.4 and 6.8 mSv respectively. SAFIRE 5 required doses of 3.4 and 4.3 mSv respectively. Clinical acceptance rate was improved by the higher voltage (110 kV) for all images in comparison to 80 kV, which required a higher dose for acceptable image quality. 3 mm images were typically better quality than 1 mm images. Conclusion: SAFIRE 5 was optimal for dose reduction and image quality.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Salforden_US
dc.subjectSAFIREen_US
dc.subjectFBPen_US
dc.subjectCTen_US
dc.subjectPediatricsen_US
dc.subjectChesten_US
dc.subjectImage qualityen_US
dc.titleExperimental article Maintaining image quality for paediatric chest CTs while lowering dose: FBP versus SAFIREen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SAen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/4541


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel