Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorArntzen, Erik
dc.contributor.authorÅstad, Tonje Gellein
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-19T09:30:29Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/2927
dc.descriptionMaster i læring i komplekse systemeren_US
dc.description.abstractArticle 1 gives an account of how cognitive psychology and behavior analysis understand and explain memory or remembering. Within behavior analysis, the most common procedure for studying remembering is matching-to-sample procedures. Cognitive psychology employs such procedure also, but the Article 1 gives examples of other procedures used to either recall or recognize earlier presented stimuli as words and items. Both cognitive psychology and behavior analysis focus on for how long a past event can control correct responding, and how fast participants respond immediately after the presentation of stimuli, or after a delay. The procedures may not seem to be so different. However, the main difference is related to how the cognitive psychology and behavior analysis interpret the outcome of these behavioral events. Cognitive psychology explains remembering or memory in models and structures, e.g., short-term memory, long-term memory, different systems of working memory, and the transfer of information from one system to another. On the other hand, behavior analysis describes the functional relation between the environmental conditions and the observed behavior, and argues that remembering is something we do, and not any hypothetical constructs. Furthermore, there is a distinction between remembering and reminding, where there are some stimuli guiding correct responding, and just remember without any present stimuli to evoke responses. Article 2 presents an experiment using a titrating DMTS (TDMTS) procedure. Thirty participants are allocated to three different groups, 10 in each. For two groups, a baseline training is conducted prior the TDMTS condition and for one group, TDMTS condition only is investigated. The main results from this experiment show no differences in the accuracy of responding between the groups. However, the response patterns are more stable in the TDMTS procedure for those who had some training of conditional discrimination on beforehand. Finally, the reaction time data show a typical pattern of an increase in reaction time from training to test, and decrease during the test conditionsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHøgskolen i Oslo og Akershusen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMALKS;2015
dc.subjectRememberingen_US
dc.subjectCognitive psychologyen_US
dc.subjectBehavior analysisen_US
dc.subjectTitrating delayed matching-to-sampleen_US
dc.subjectAdult human participantsen_US
dc.subjectKomplekse systemeren_US
dc.subjectMinneen_US
dc.subjectKognitiv psykologien_US
dc.subjectAtferdsanalyseen_US
dc.titleApproaches to understanding of rememberingen_US
dc.title.alternativeDifferent Approaches in the Study of Remembering. Article 1en_US
dc.title.alternativeEffects of including a separate conditional discrimination training or not before implementing a titrating delayed matching-to-sample procedure. Article 2en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record