Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKleffelgård, Ingriden_US
dc.contributor.authorRøe, Cecilieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Leiven_US
dc.contributor.authorHellstrøm, Torgeiren_US
dc.contributor.authorSøberg, Helene L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-19T09:36:46Z
dc.date.available2014-03-19T09:36:46Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationKleffelgård, I., Røe, C., Sandvik, L., Hellstrøm, T. & Søberg,H.L. (2013). Measurement Properties of the High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Physical Therapy, 93(7), 900-910en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9023en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1090420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/1907
dc.description.abstractBackground. The High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) was developed to quantify balance and mobility problems after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measurement properties of the HiMAT have not been tested in the mild TBI (MTBI) population. Objective. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the HiMAT in a sample of the MTBI population. Design. A cohort, pretest-posttest, comparison study was conducted. Methods. Ninety-two patients (69% men, 31% women) with a mean age of 37.1 years (SD 13.8) and a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14.7 (SD 0.7) were recruited from Oslo University Hospital. All patients were tested with the HiMAT (range of scores 0 [worst] to 54 [best]) at 3 months postinjury. Fifty-one patients were retested at 6 months. A subgroup of 25 patients was selected for the reliability testing. Balance function reported on the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire was chosen as a criterion and anchor. Criterion-related validity was studied with correlation analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for assessing interrater and intrarater reliability. Minimal detectable change (MDC) for the HiMAT was estimated. Responsiveness was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Results. The mean HiMAT sum score was 46.2 (95% confidence interval 44.4 to 48.1). The HiMAT had a ceiling effect of 22.8%. The correlation between HiMAT scores and self-reported balance problems was large (r .63, P .001). Interrater and intrarater reliability of the HiMAT sum score was high (interrater ICC .99, intrarater ICC .95). The MDC was 3 to 4 points. Responsiveness was good, and the HiMAT discriminated well between patients with self-perceived improved balance function versus unchanged balance function (area under the curve 0.86). Limitations. The small sample size, a ceiling effect, and lack of a gold standard were limitations of the study. Conclusions. The HiMAT demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties for patients with MTBI. The HiMAT can be used as an outcome measure of balance and mobility problems in patients with MTBIen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe American Physical Therapy Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhysical Therapy;93(7)en_US
dc.subjectBrain injuryen_US
dc.subjectHigh-Level Mobility Assessment Toolen_US
dc.subjectHiMATen_US
dc.subjectBalanceen_US
dc.subjectMobilityen_US
dc.subjectMild traumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.subjectMTBIen_US
dc.titleMeasurement properties of the high-level mobility assessment tool for mild traumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionUtgivers pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120381


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel