Measurement properties of the high-level mobility assessment tool for mild traumatic brain injury
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Utgivers pdf

View/ Open
Date
2013Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Kleffelgård, I., Røe, C., Sandvik, L., Hellstrøm, T. & Søberg,H.L. (2013). Measurement Properties of the High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Physical Therapy, 93(7), 900-910 http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120381Abstract
Background. The High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) was developed
to quantify balance and mobility problems after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measurement
properties of the HiMAT have not been tested in the mild TBI (MTBI)
population.
Objective. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability, validity, and
responsiveness of the HiMAT in a sample of the MTBI population.
Design. A cohort, pretest-posttest, comparison study was conducted.
Methods. Ninety-two patients (69% men, 31% women) with a mean age of 37.1
years (SD 13.8) and a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14.7 (SD 0.7) were
recruited from Oslo University Hospital. All patients were tested with the HiMAT
(range of scores 0 [worst] to 54 [best]) at 3 months postinjury. Fifty-one patients
were retested at 6 months. A subgroup of 25 patients was selected for the reliability
testing. Balance function reported on the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms
Questionnaire was chosen as a criterion and anchor. Criterion-related validity was
studied with correlation analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used
for assessing interrater and intrarater reliability. Minimal detectable change (MDC) for
the HiMAT was estimated. Responsiveness was assessed with receiver operating
characteristic curve analyses.
Results. The mean HiMAT sum score was 46.2 (95% confidence interval 44.4 to
48.1). The HiMAT had a ceiling effect of 22.8%. The correlation between HiMAT
scores and self-reported balance problems was large (r .63, P .001). Interrater
and intrarater reliability of the HiMAT sum score was high (interrater ICC .99,
intrarater ICC .95). The MDC was 3 to 4 points. Responsiveness was good, and
the HiMAT discriminated well between patients with self-perceived improved balance
function versus unchanged balance function (area under the curve 0.86).
Limitations. The small sample size, a ceiling effect, and lack of a gold standard
were limitations of the study.
Conclusions. The HiMAT demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties for
patients with MTBI. The HiMAT can be used as an outcome measure of balance and
mobility problems in patients with MTBI