Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorThørrisen, Mikkel Magnus
dc.contributor.authorMørk, Gry
dc.contributor.authorÅsli, Lene Angel
dc.contributor.authorGramstad, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorStigen, Linda
dc.contributor.authorMagne, Trine A
dc.contributor.authorCarstensen, Tove
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Susanne Grødem
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Ted
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hua Beng
dc.contributor.authorFong, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorBonsaksen, Tore
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T12:46:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T11:24:15Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T12:46:45Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T11:24:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-11
dc.identifier.citationThørrisen, Mørk, Åsli, Gramstad, Stigen, Magne TA, Carstensen, Johnson SG, Brown, Lim, Fong, Bonsaksen. Student characteristics associated with dominant approaches to studying: Comparing a national and an international sample . Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2020en
dc.identifier.issn1103-8128
dc.identifier.issn1651-2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/9532
dc.description.abstractBackground: Productive approaches to studying (deep and strategic learning) are associated with a variety of favorable academic outcomes, and may be of particular importance for students in multifaceted and complex disciplines such as occupational therapy. Aim: To explore associations between student characteristics and their dominant approaches to studying in two samples of occupational therapy students: A national sample of Norwegian first-year students, and an international sample of students in different year cohorts (Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Norway). Materials and methods: 180 (national sample) and 665 (international sample) students were included in the study. Approaches to studying were measured with the Approaches to Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Data were analyzed with adjusted multinomial regression analyses. Results: Age, gender and prior higher education were not associated with dominant study approach. More time spent on independent study (international sample: OR = 1.07/1.08, p <.01/<.001) and having current study program as the top priority line of education at enrolment (national sample: OR = 2.89, p <.05) predicted productive study approaches. Conclusions and significance: Factors such as age, gender and prior higher education seem to be of limited importance for understanding students’ dominant approaches to studying.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy;
dc.rightsOpen Access publiseringsavtale Avtaleperiode November 2019 – desember 2022.en
dc.subjectHigher educationen
dc.subjectLearningen
dc.subjectMultinomial logistic regressionsen
dc.subjectOccupational therapyen
dc.titleStudent characteristics associated with dominant approaches to studying: Comparing a national and an international sampleen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-11-17T12:46:45Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1831056
dc.identifier.cristin1835397
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
dc.relation.projectIDUniversitetet i Stavanger: IN-11551


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel