dc.contributor.author | Kienlin, Simone Maria | |
dc.contributor.author | Nytrøen, Kari | |
dc.contributor.author | Stacey, Dawn | |
dc.contributor.author | Kasper, Jürgen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-15T15:09:31Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-11T05:12:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-15T15:09:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-11T05:12:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-03-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kienlin SM, Nytrøen K, Stacey D, Kasper J. Ready for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patients. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. 2020;26(2):610-621 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-1294 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2753 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/9511 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: While shared decision-making (SDM) training programmes for health
professionals have been developed in several countries, few have been evaluated. In
Norway, a comprehensive curriculum, “klar for samvalg” (ready for SDM), for interprofessional health-care teams was created using generic didactic methods and guidance to tailor training to various contexts. The programmes adapted didactic methods
from an evidence-based German training programmes (doktormitSDM). The overall
aim was to evaluate two particular SDM modules on facilitating SDM implementation
into clinical practice.
Method: A descriptive mixed methods study using questionnaires and a focus group
guided by the Medical Research Council Complex Interventions Framework. The
training was provided as two different applications (module AB [introduction and
SDM-basics] and module ABC [introduction, SDM-basics and interactive training])
with differing learning objectives, extent of interactivity, and duration (1 vs 2 hours).
Groups of participants were recruited consecutively based on requests for health professional SDM training in university/college- and hospital-settings. By a focus group
and a self-administered questionnaire comprehensibility, relevance and acceptance
were assessed and qualitative feedback collected after the training. Data passed
descriptive and content analysis, respectively. Knowledge was assessed twice using
five multiple-choice items and analysed using paired t-tests.Results: In 11 (six AB and five ABC) training sessions, 357/429 (296 AB and 133 ABC)
eligible nurses, physicians and health professional students with varying clinical backgrounds and previous levels of SDM-knowledge participated. SDM-knowledge increased
from 25-78% (range pretest) to 85-95% (range post-test) (P ≤ .001).
The training was rated easy to understand, acceptable and relevant for practice. Findings to improve the education suggest higher emphasis on interprofessional teaching methods.
Conclusions: The two SDM training modules met the basic requirements for use in a
broader SDM implementation strategy and can even improve knowledge. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | The project was funded by the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority and was undertaken as part of the project “DAfactory ‐ Strategies of development, evaluation and implementation of patient treatment decision aids at the University Hospital of North Norway, UNN” (HST1246‐15). | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice;Volume 26, Issue 2 | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Curriculum | en |
dc.subject | Decision making | en |
dc.subject | Interprofessionals | en |
dc.subject | Medical education | en |
dc.subject | Training | en |
dc.subject | Shared decision making | en |
dc.title | Ready for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patients | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2020-11-15T15:09:31Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13380 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1812295 | |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice | |