Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLavender, Tina
dc.contributor.authorBernitz, Stine
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T10:28:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T11:28:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T10:28:55Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T11:28:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-26
dc.identifier.citationLavender T, Bernitz S. Use of the partograph - Current thinking. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020:1-11en
dc.identifier.issn1521-6934
dc.identifier.issn1521-6934
dc.identifier.issn1532-1932
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/9375
dc.description.abstractThe partograph (sometimes called partogram) is a labour monitoring tool that is used in countries worldwide to enable early detection of complications, so that referral, action or closer observations can ensue. While the partograph has received global support, from health professionals, there are concerns that it has not reached its full potential in improving clinical outcomes. This has resulted in several variations of the tool and a plethora of studies aimed at exploring the barriers and facilitators to its use. In this chapter, we will discuss the history of the partograph, outlining how it has evolved over time. We will also suggest reasons why the tool may not be meeting the needs of all practitioners. In particular, we will explore partograph use as a complex intervention, suggesting that its success is likely to be dependent on multiple contextual factors.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOslo Metropolitan University provided funding for reproducing the figures.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBest Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology;Volume 67, August 2020
dc.subjectPartographsen
dc.subjectPartogramsen
dc.subjectLabouren
dc.subjectMonitoringen
dc.subjectProgressen
dc.titleUse of the partograph - Current thinkingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-09-15T10:28:55Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.010
dc.identifier.cristin1810255
dc.source.journalBest Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel