Involving nursing students into clinical research projects: Reliability of data and experiences of students?
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/9328Utgivelsesdato
2020-07-23Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Originalversjon
Sortland, Halvorsen KH, Saltyte Benth J, Almendingen KA. Involving nursing students into clinical research projects: Reliability of data and experiences of students?. Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN). 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15423Sammendrag
Aims: To examine reliability of the screening data collected by nursing students.
Furthermore, to examine students' evaluations of participation in nutritional screening
of older hospitalised patients.
Background: In cross-sectional study on nutritional risk and care in older hospitalised
patients, the prevalence for undernutrition was 45%, a finding corresponding with
other international studies. In this study, nursing students (n = 173) screened older
patients (n = 508) for malnutrition, while they were in hospital practice. The validity
of the results thus depends on the quality of the students screening.
Methods: Agreement in measurements on age, weight, height and nutritional risk
scoring by students using Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) was assessed for
30 randomly selected hospitalised patients (≥70 years), with data collected by students
in the study and two additional students. Bland–Altman analysis was used for
continuous measurements, while kappa statistic was used to assess agreement between
the NRS 2002 scores. Experiences of all included students were described. A
STROBE checklist was completed.
Results: No significant bias was found among the students. Questionnaire data
showed that 70.5% of the students agreed that the NRS 2002 was easy to use and
59.0% found it easier to measure the patients' height than weight. It was 70.5% who
found it difficult to find previously recorded information on the patients' weight in
the electronic records. Only 13% found it easy to find information on patients' nutritional
status. 37.0% agreed that participating in the screening was instructive, and
34.0% gained increased interest in nutritional care.
Conclusion: Collaborating with students in screening older patients for nutritional
risk and undernutrition gave reliable data and increased the students' interest in nutritional
care among hospitalised patients.
Relevance to clinical practice: Collaborating with students contributes with valuable
data for practice and research. Moreover, it increases students' engagement for improved
care practices for older patients.