Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTingulstad, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorMunk, Rikke
dc.contributor.authorGrotle, Margreth
dc.contributor.authorVigdal, Ørjan Nesse
dc.contributor.authorStorheim, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorLanghammer, Birgitta
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T10:18:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-20T11:12:20Z
dc.date.available2019-12-18T10:18:08Z
dc.date.available2019-12-20T11:12:20Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-23
dc.identifier.citationTingulstad A, Munk, Grotle M, Vigdal ØN, Storheim K, Langhammer B. Back beliefs among elderly seeking health care due to back pain; psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the back beliefs questionnaire. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019;20(1)en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/7935
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a 14-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures attitudes and beliefs about the consequences of back pain. The BBQ has recently been translated into Norwegian, but its psychometric properties have not yet been tested. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and construct validity of the BBQ when used on elderly patients with back pain. Method: A prospective cohort study with a test-retest design among 116 elderly patients (> 55 years of age) seeking primary care for a new episode of back pain. Test-retest, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), internal consistency and construct validity by a priori hypotheses (Spearman’s- and Pearson correlation coefficient) were tested. Results: A total of 116 patients, mean age (SD) 67.7 (8.3), were included and 63 patients responded to the testretest assessment. The mean (SD) BBQ sum scores (range 9–45) were 29.8 (7.0) and 29.2 (6.7) for the test and retest respectively. The test-retest was acceptable with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54–0.82), SEM was 3.8 and MDC 10.5. Internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha was good (0.82) and acceptable construct validity was supported by the confirmation of 75% of the a priori hypotheses. Conclusion: The Norwegian version of the BBQ demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and good construct validity and can be used to assess pessimistic beliefs in elderly patients with back pain.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for this study was provided by the Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Education in Physiotherapy.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMC (part of Springer Nature)en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;20, Article number: 510 (2019)
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBack belief questionnairesen
dc.subjectBack painsen
dc.subjectValiditiesen
dc.subjectReliabilitiesen
dc.subjectElderly peopleen
dc.titleBack beliefs among elderly seeking health care due to back pain; psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the back beliefs questionnaireen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2019-12-18T10:18:08Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2910-8
dc.identifier.cristin1748257
dc.source.journalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.