Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDeilkås, Ellen C Tveter
dc.contributor.authorRisberg, Madeleine Borgstedt
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Marion
dc.contributor.authorLindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer
dc.contributor.authorNylén, Urban
dc.contributor.authorRutberg, Hans
dc.contributor.authorSoop, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-11T07:42:26Z
dc.date.available2019-07-11T07:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-20
dc.identifier.citationDeilkas, E. T., Risberg, M. B., Haugen, M., Lindstrom, J. C., Nylen, U., Rutberg, H., & Michael, S. (2017). Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool. BMJ Open, 7(3), e012492. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/7262
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: In this paper, we explore similarities and differences in hospital adverse event (AE) rates between Norway and Sweden by reviewing medical records with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). DESIGN: All acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews, except one in Norway. Records were randomly selected from all eligible admissions in 2013. Eligible admissions were patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing care with an in-hospital stay of at least 24 hours, excluding psychiatric and care and rehabilitation. Reviews were done according to GTT methodology. SETTING: Similar contexts for healthcare and similar socioeconomic and demographic characteristics have inspired the Nordic countries to exchange experiences from measuring and monitoring quality and patient safety in healthcare. The co-operation has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national and local rates of AEs in hospital care. PARTICIPANTS: 10 986 medical records were reviewed in Norway and 19 141 medical records in Sweden. RESULTS: No significant difference between overall AE rates was found between the two countries. The rate was 13.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 14.3%) in Norway and 14.4% (95% CI 12.6% to 16.3%) in Sweden. There were significantly higher AE rates of surgical complications in Norwegian hospitals compared with Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and 'other' AEs. Among more severe AEs, Norwegian hospitals had significantly higher rates of surgical complications than Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of postpartum AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The level of patient safety in acute care hospitals, as assessed by GTT, was essentially the same in both countries. The differences between the countries in the rates of several types of AEs provide new incentives for Norwegian and Swedish governing bodies to address patient safety issues.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMJ Open;7(3)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectArtikkelen
dc.titleExploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Toolen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492
dc.identifier.cristin1492252


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States