An examination of the structural validity of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short Form (PSDQ–S) using the Rasch Measurement Model
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Ted | |
dc.contributor.author | Bonsaksen, Tore | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-07T13:42:05Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-19T08:47:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-07T13:42:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-19T08:47:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brown T, Bonsaksen T. An examination of the structural validity of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short Form (PSDQ–S) using the Rasch Measurement Model. Cogent Education. 2019;6:1-28 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2331-186X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2331-186X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/6794 | |
dc.description.abstract | It is important for self-report scales and measures used by educators and health care professionals (such as the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short Form [PSDQ–S]) to have documented reliability and validity. The aim of this study is to investigate the structural validity of the full PSDQ–S composite scale and 11 subscales using the Rasch Measurement Model. 117 healthy children (65 males and 52 females; M = 10 years, 2 months, SD = 1 year, 4 months) completed the PSDQ–S. The PSDQ–S’s rating scale functioning, dimensionality, hierarchical ordering, differential item functioning (DIF), and item and person separation reliability were examined. Results supported the scale functioning, dimensionality, hierarchical ordering, DIF, and reliability of the PSDQ–S composite scale and each of its 11 subscales. Therefore, the PSDQ–S composite scale and 11 subscales can be used with confidence to assess children’s self-reported physical self-concept. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Cogent OA | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Cogent Education;(2019), 6:1571146 | |
dc.rights | © 2019 The Author(s). This open access article is Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Validities | en |
dc.subject | Physical self-concepts | en |
dc.subject | Children | en |
dc.subject | Self-report assessments | en |
dc.subject | Rasch measurement models | en |
dc.title | An examination of the structural validity of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short Form (PSDQ–S) using the Rasch Measurement Model | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2019-02-07T13:42:04Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1571146 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1655776 | |
dc.source.journal | Cogent Education |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
HV - Institutt for rehabiliteringsvitenskap og helseteknologi [395]
HV - Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019 The Author(s). This open access article is Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.