Ten-year survival after High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy in high-risk prostate cancer: A comparison with the Norwegian SPCG-7 cohort
Journal article, Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionWedde TB, Småstuen MC, Brabrand S, Fosså SD, Kaasa S, Tafjord G, Russnes KM, Hellebust TP, Lilleby W. Ten-year survival after High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy in high-risk prostate cancer: A comparison with the Norwegian SPCG-7 cohort. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2018:1-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.013
Background: The survival benefit of dose-escalation with High-Dose-Rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains debatable. We investigated 10-year PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) in high-risk patients treated with HDR-BT/EBRT compared to EBRT alone. Methods: HDR-BT boosts were given followed by 50 Gy conformal EBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The HDR-BT/EBRT group (N:325) received Androgen Deprivation Therapy for median 2 years. The historical control group (N:296), received a median dose of 70 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles with lifelong Anti-Androgen Treatment. For each treatment group, PCSM and OM were calculated using competing-risk and Kaplan-Meier analyses, respectively. Differences were assessed with the logrank test. OM and PCSM were computed using Cox and Fine & Grey regression. Significance level set to p<0.05. Patient-measured (PM) toxicity were assessed by EPIC-26 questionnaire at 5 years. Results: Median follow-up was 104 and 120 months for the HDR-BT/EBRT and the EBRT group respectively. A 3.6-fold decreased risk of PCSM (p<0.01) and a 1.6-fold decreased risk of OM (p=0.02) in the HDR-BT/EBRT cohort compared to the EBRT-only group were revealed. Ten year OM and PCSM rates were 16 % and 2.5% in the HDR-BT/EBRT group versus 23% and 8.2% in the EBRT-only group respectively. Treatment modality (SHR=3.58, 95%CI 1.40-9.14) and Gleason score (SHR=2.58, 95%CI 1.15 5.78) were associated with PCSM. Only treatment modality (HR=1.63, 95%CI=1.08-2.44) was significantly associated with OM. Conclusions: Men with high-risk PCa have a significantly reduced PCSM and OM rates when treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy achieved by HDR-BT/EBRT compared to EBRT alone (70 Gy). PM toxicity scores were acceptable and similar to the ProtecT study. A Gleason score of 8-10 was independently associated with increased risk of PCSM. Randomized studies in men with high-risk disease treated with dose-escalation are warranted.