Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKorsmo-Haugen, Henny-Kristine
dc.contributor.authorBrurberg, Kjetil Gundro
dc.contributor.authorMann, Jim I
dc.contributor.authorAas, Anne-Marie
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-27T09:31:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T14:16:31Z
dc.date.available2019-02-27T09:31:47Z
dc.date.available2019-03-05T14:16:31Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-11
dc.identifier.citationKorsmo-Haugen, Brurberg KG, Mann JI, Aas A. Carbohydrate quantity in the dietary management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes, obesity and metabolism. 2018;21:15-27en
dc.identifier.issn1462-8902
dc.identifier.issn1462-8902
dc.identifier.issn1463-1326
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/6726
dc.description.abstractAims: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the effects of low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) on body weight, glycaemic control, lipid profile and blood pressure with those observed on higher carbohydrate diets (HCDs) in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Food Science Source and SweMed+ databases were systematically searched to identify randomised controlled trials (duration ≥ 3 months) investigating the effects of a LCD compared to a HCD in the management of type 2 diabetes. Data were extracted and pooled using a random effects model and expressed as mean differences and risk ratio. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to examine the effects of duration of intervention, extent of carbohydrate restriction and risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Of the 1589 studies identified, 23, including 2178 participants, met inclusion criteria. Reductions were slightly greater on LCDs than HCDs for HbA1c (-1.0 mmol/mol, CI -1.9, - 0.1 [-0.09%, CI -0.17, -0.01]) and triglycerides (-0.13 mmol/l, CI -0.24, -0.02). Changes in weight, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol and blood pressure did not differ significantly between groups. Subgroup analyses suggested that the difference in HbA1c was only evident in studies with duration of ≤6 months and with high risk of bias. Conclusions: The proportion of daily energy provided by carbohydrate intake is not an important determinant of response to dietary management, especially when considering longer term trials. A range of dietary patterns including those traditionally consumed in Mediterranean countries seems suitable for translating nutritional recommendations for people with diabetes into practical advice.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiabetes, obesity and metabolism;Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2019
dc.rightsThis is the peer revieweded version of the following article: Carbohydrate quantity in the dietary management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, which has been accepted and is published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13499. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.en
dc.subjectDietary interventionsen
dc.subjectMeta-analysesen
dc.subjectGlycaemic controlen
dc.subjectDyslipidaemiaen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewsen
dc.subjectType 2 diabetesen
dc.titleCarbohydrate quantity in the dietary management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2019-02-27T09:31:46Z
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13499
dc.identifier.cristin1604103
dc.source.journalDiabetes, obesity and metabolism


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel