Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBonsaksen, Tore
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-30T17:04:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T13:29:38Z
dc.date.available2018-01-30T17:04:32Z
dc.date.available2018-04-16T13:29:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBonsaksen T. Factors associated with occupational therapy students’ preferences for courses and teaching. Cogent Education. 2018;5(1)en
dc.identifier.issn2331-186X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/5899
dc.description.abstractBackground: Students’ preferences for teaching have been associated with their own approaches to studying. However, whether teaching preferences are associated with a set of student characteristics is yet unknown. Aim: To investigate whether sociodemographic, education-related and personal factors were associated with preferences for teaching among Norwegian occupational therapy students. Methods: One hundred and forty-six students (mean age 23.7 years, 78.8% women) participated in the study. Self-report questionnaires were employed, including the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Differences between student cohorts were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance and χ 2 -tests, whereas factors associ- ated with the students’ teaching preferences were analyzed with linear regression models. Results: Overall, the students preferred teaching oriented toward “transmit- ting information” over teaching oriented toward “supporting understanding”. Higher age, higher levels of general self-efficacy and spending more time on independent study were associated with having a stronger preference for the “supporting un- derstanding” teaching type. Conclusions: Compared to their counterparts, students of higher age, who study more independently, and who have higher general self- efficacy are more inclined to prefer teaching that supports understanding, which is compatible with the expectations in higher education institutions.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCogent OAen
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s). This open access ar ticle is distributed under a Creative Co mmons At tribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Yo u ar e fr ee to: Shar e — copy and r edistribute the material in an y medium or format Ad apt — r emix, tr ansform, and build upon the material for an y purpose, even commer cially . The licensor cannot revo ke these fr eedoms as long as yo u foll ow the license terms. Under the follo wing terms: Attribution — Yo u must give appro priate cr edit, pr ovi de a link to the license, and indicate if changes we re made. Yo u may do so in an y reasonable manner , but not in an y wa y that suggests the licensor endorses yo u or yo ur use. No additional restric tions Yo u may not apply legal terms or technological measur es that legally restric t others fr om doing an ything the license permits.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHigher educationen
dc.subjectOccupational therapyen
dc.subjectTeachingen
dc.subjectStudentsen
dc.titleFactors associated with occupational therapy students’ preferences for courses and teachingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2018-01-30T17:04:32Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1431426
dc.identifier.cristin1547043
dc.source.journalCogent Education


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

© 2018 The Author(s). This open access ar
ticle is distributed under a Creative 
Co
mmons 
At
tribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Yo
u ar
e fr
ee to: 
Shar
e — copy
 and r
edistribute the material in an
y medium or format
Ad
apt — r
emix, tr
ansform, and build upon the material for an
y purpose, even commer
cially
.
The licensor cannot 
revo
ke these fr
eedoms as long as yo
u foll
ow
 the license terms.
Under the follo
wing terms:
Attribution — Yo
u must give
 appro
priate cr
edit, pr
ovi
de a link to the license, and indicate if changes 
we
re made.
Yo
u may do so in an
y reasonable manner
, but not in an
y wa
y that suggests the licensor endorses 
yo
u or yo
ur use.
No additional 
restric
tions 
Yo
u may not apply legal terms or technological measur
es that legally 
restric
t others fr
om doing an
ything the license permits.
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som © 2018 The Author(s). This open access ar ticle is distributed under a Creative Co mmons At tribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Yo u ar e fr ee to: Shar e — copy and r edistribute the material in an y medium or format Ad apt — r emix, tr ansform, and build upon the material for an y purpose, even commer cially . The licensor cannot revo ke these fr eedoms as long as yo u foll ow the license terms. Under the follo wing terms: Attribution — Yo u must give appro priate cr edit, pr ovi de a link to the license, and indicate if changes we re made. Yo u may do so in an y reasonable manner , but not in an y wa y that suggests the licensor endorses yo u or yo ur use. No additional restric tions Yo u may not apply legal terms or technological measur es that legally restric t others fr om doing an ything the license permits.