Validation of Doloplus-2 among nonverbal nursing home patients : an evaluation of Doloplus-2 in a clinical setting
Torvik, Karin; Kaasa, Stein; Kirkevold, Øyvind; Saltvedt, Ingvild; Hølen, Jacob Christian; Fayers, Peter; Rustøen, Tone
Journal article, Peer reviewed
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
View/ Open
Date
2010-02-20Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Torvik, K., Kaasa, S., Kirkevold, Ø., Saltvedt, I., Hølen, J.K., Fayers, P. & Rustøen, T. (2010). Validation of Doloplus-2 among nonverbal nursing home patients : an evaluation of Doloplus-2 in a clinical setting. BMC Geriatrics, 10 (9) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-9Abstract
Background: Pain measurement in nonverbal older adults is best based on behavioural observation, e.g. using an
observational measurement tool such as Doloplus-2. The purposes of this study were to examine the use of
Doloplus-2 in a nonverbal nursing home population, and to evaluate its reliability and validity by comparing
registered nurses’ estimation of pain with Doloplus-2 scores.
Method: In this cross-sectional study, Doloplus-2 was used to observe the pain behaviour of patients aged above
65 years who were unable to self-report their pain. Nurses also recorded their perceptions of patient pain (yes, no,
don’t know) before they used Doloplus-2. Data on demographics, medical diagnoses, and prescribed pain
treatment were collected from patient records. Daily life functioning was measured and participants were screened
using the Mini Mental State Examination.
Results: In total, 77 nursing home patients were included, 75% were women and the mean age was 86 years (SD
6.6, range 68-100). Over 50% were dependent on nursing care to a high or a medium degree, and all were
severely cognitively impaired. The percentage of zero scores on Doloplus-2 ranged from 17% (somatic reactions) to
40% (psychosocial reactions). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.71 for the total scale. In total, 52% of the patients were
judged by nurses to be experiencing pain, compared with 68% when using Doloplus-2 (p = 0.01). For 29% of the
sample, nurses were unable to report if the patients were in pain.
Conclusions: In the present study, more patients were categorized as having pain while using Doloplus-2
compared with nurses’ estimation of pain without using any tools. The fact that nurses could not report if the
patients were in pain in one third of the patients supports the claim that Doloplus-2 is a useful supplement for
estimating pain in this population. However, nurses must use their clinical experience in addition to the use of
Doloplus-2, as behaviour can have different meaning for different patients. Further research is still needed about
the use of Doloplus-2 in patients not able to self-report their pain.