Employing a randomized control group design, this study compared the efficacy of staff training
using theory training, hands
-
on supervision and a self
-
instructional teaching man
ual. Participants
were 12 undergraduate, health or social
-
work students. Initially, participants were given a three
-
hour lecture, and as a result, staff
-
participants increased their use of correct teaching procedures,
but not to mastery. Participants in bo
th groups continued to increase their teaching skills after
intervention with either hands
-
on training or the self
-
instructional manual, though best effect was
achieved with hands
-
on supervision. This effect was maintained at a two
-
month follow
-
up. At the
end of the experiment, participants in the treatment manual group received hands
-
on supervision.
As a result, their performances increased to the same levels as the participants in the hands
-
on
supervision group. Hence, hands
-
on supervision was superior in
increasing teaching performances.
Participants receiving hands
-
on supervision reported that they were comfortable receiving this
type of supervision, that the hands
-
on supervision was the best way to learn correct teaching
procedures and that they would p
refer hands
-
on supervision in a future job situation. Also,
independent assessors rated hands
-
on supervision as the most suitable intervention.