Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHildingsson, Ingegerd
dc.contributor.authorBlix, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorHegaard, Hanne Kristine
dc.contributor.authorHuitfeldt, Anette
dc.contributor.authorIngversen, Karen
dc.contributor.authorOlafsdottir, Olof Asta
dc.contributor.authorLindgren, Helena
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-08T13:02:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T09:49:37Z
dc.date.available2016-04-08T13:02:35Z
dc.date.available2017-03-24T09:49:37Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-15
dc.identifier.citationBirth 2015, 42(4):346-353language
dc.identifier.issn1523-536X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/4477
dc.description.abstractObjective: Normal progress of labo u r is a subject for discussion among professionals. The aim of th is study was to assess the length of labour in women with a planned home birth and spontaneous onset who gave birth at home or in hospital after transfer. Methods : This is a population - based study of home birth s in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, No rway and Sweden). All midwives assisting at a home birth from 200 8 - 2013 were asked to provide information about home birth s using a questionnaire. Result s: B irth data from 1612 women, from Denmark, ( n= 1170), Norway (n=263) Sweden (n=138), and Iceland (n=41) was included . The total median length from onset of labour until the birth of the baby was approximately 14 hours for primiparas and 7 . 2 5 hours for multiparas. The length of the different phases varied bet ween countries. Blood loss > 1000 ml and perine a l ruptures that needed suturing were associated with a longer pushing phase and the latter with country of residence, parity, single status and the baby’s weight . Conclusion: In this population of healthy women with a low prevalence of interventions the total length of labour was fairly similar to what is described in the literature for multiparas, but longer for primiparas . Although the length of the phases of labo ur differed among countries , it was to a minor extent associated with severe outcome s .language
dc.language.isoenlanguage
dc.publisherWileylanguage
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the following article: Hildingsson, I., Blix, E., Hegaard, H., Huitfeldt, A., Ingversen, K., Ólafsdóttír, Ó. Á., & Lindgren, H. (2015). How Long Is a Normal Labor? Contemporary Patterns of Labor and Birth in a Low‐Risk Sample of 1,612 Women from Four Nordic Countries. Birth, 42(4), 346-353., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/birt.12191.language
dc.subjectLength of labourlanguage
dc.subjectPhysiological birthlanguage
dc.subjectPhases of labourlanguage
dc.subjectCountry of birthlanguage
dc.subjectHome birthlanguage
dc.titleHow Long Is a Normal Labor? Contemporary Patterns of Labor and Birth in a Low-Risk Sample of 1,612 Women from Four Nordic Countrieslanguage
dc.typePeer reviewedlanguage
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2016-04-08T13:02:35Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionlanguage
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12191
dc.identifier.cristin1292691


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel