• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for helsevitenskap (HV)
  • HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for helsevitenskap (HV)
  • HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Nurses' role and care practices in decision-making regarding artificial ventilation in late stage pulmonary disease.

Jerpseth, Heidi; Nortvedt, Per; Dahl, Vegard; Halvorsen, Kristin
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
View/Open
Postprint (525.8Kb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/3235
Date
2016
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid [1566]
Original version
Jerpseth, H., Dahl, V., Nortvedt, P., & Halvorsen, K. (2016). Nurses’ role and care practices in decision-making regarding artificial ventilation in late stage pulmonary disease. Nursing ethics, 0969733015626600.   http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733015626600
Abstract
Background:

Decisions regarding whether or not to institute mechanical ventilation during the later

stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is challenging both ethically, emotionally and medically.

Caring for these patients is a multifaceted process where nurses play a crucial role.

Research question and design:

We have investigated how nurses experienced their own role in

decision-making processes regarding mechanical v

entilation in later stages of chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease and how they consider the patients’ role in these processes. We applied a qualitative

approach, with six focus-group interviews of nurses (n

¼

26).

Ethical considerations:

The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics approved the

study. Voluntary informed consent was obtained.

Findings:

The nurses found themselves operating within a cure-directed treatment culture wherein they

were unable to stand up for the caring values. They perceived their roles and responsibilities in decision-

making processes regarding mechanical ventilation to patients as unclear and unsatisfactory. They also

experienced inadequate interdisciplinary cooperation.

Discussion:

Lack of communication skills, the traditional hierarchical hospital culture together with

operating in a medical-orientated treatment culture where caring values is rated as less important might

explain the nurses’ absence in participation in the decision about mechanical ventilation.

Conclusion:

To be able to advocate for the patients’ and their own right to be included in decision-making

processes, nurses need an awaren

ess of their own responsibilities. This requires personal courage,

leadership who are capable of organising common interpersonal meetings and willingness on the part of

the physicians to include and value the nurses’ participation in decision-making processes.
Publisher
SAGE Publication

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit