Cognitive dysfunction in adolescents with chronic fatigue: a cross-sectional study
Sulheim, Dag; Fagermoen, Frode Even; Sivertsen, Øyvind Stople; Winger, Anette; Wyller, Vegard Bruun; Øie, Merete Glenne
Journal article, Peer reviewed
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the creative commons attribution non commercial ( c c b y- n c 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
View/ Open
Date
2015Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Sulheim, D., Fagermoen, F.E., Sivertsen, Ø.S., Winger, A., Wyller, V.B. & Øie, M.G. (2015). Cognitive dysfunction in adolescents with chronic fatigue: a cross-sectional study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100(9), 838-844. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306764Abstract
Objective To compare cognitive function in
adolescents with chronic fatigue with cognitive function
in healthy controls (HC).
Study design Cross-sectional study.
Setting Paediatric department at Oslo University
Hospital, Norway.
Participants 120 adolescents with chronic fatigue
(average age 15.4 years; range 12–18) and 39 HC
(average age 15.2 years; range 12–18).
Methods The adolescents completed a neurocognitive
test battery measuring processing speed, working
memory, cognitive inhibition, cognitive flexibility, verbal
learning and verbal memory, and questionnaires
addressing demographic data, depression symptoms,
anxiety traits, fatigue and sleep problems. Parents
completed the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive
Function (BRIEF), which measures the everyday executive
functions of children.
Results Adolescents with chronic fatigue had impaired
cognitive function compared to HC regarding processing
speed (mean difference 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5,
p=0.003), working memory (−2.4, −3.7 to −1.1,
p<0.001), cognitive inhibition response time (6.2, 0.8 to
11.7, p=0.025) and verbal learning (−1.7, −3.2 to
−0.3, p=0.022). The BRIEF results indicated that
everyday executive functions were significantly worse in
the chronic fatigue group compared to the HC (11.2, 8.2
to 14.3, p<0.001). Group differences remained largely
unaffected when adjusted for symptoms of depression,
anxiety traits and sleep problems.
Conclusions Adolescents with chronic fatigue had
impaired cognitive function of clinical relevance,
measured by objective cognitive tests, in comparison to
HC. Working memory and processing speed may represent core difficulties