Rasch analysis of the sense of coherence scale in a sample of people with morbid obesity – a cross-sectional study
Journal article, Peer reviewed
© 2014 lerdal et al.; licensee bio med central ltd. this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. the creative commons public domain dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
View/ Open
Date
2014Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Lerdal, A., Fagermoen, M.S., Bonsaksen, T., Gay, C.L. & Kottorp, A. (2014). Rasch analysis of the Sense of Coherence scale in a sample of people with morbid obesity - A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology, 2(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-2-1Abstract
Background: The prevalence of morbid obesity is an increasing health problem in most parts of the world and is
related to lower quality of life. Sense of coherence, or the perception that the world is meaningful and predictable,
is considered a promising health resource for changing behaviour and adopting a healthier lifestyle. Thus, a valid
and reliable instrument for measuring sense of coherence is needed to further research and clinical efforts in this
area. The purpose of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the 13-item Sense of Coherence
scale and its sub-dimensions (Comprehensibility, Manageability, and Meaningfulness) in a sample of people with
morbid obesity using a Rasch analysis approach.
Methods: Data were collected cross-sectionally in Norway in 2009 from 142 patients attending a mandatory
patient education course for patients with morbid obesity on a waiting list for treatment. Participants completed a
socio-demographic questionnaire and the 13-item Sense of Coherence scale at the beginning of the course. Evidence
of rating scale functioning, internal scale validity, person-response validity, person-separation reliability and differential
item functioning of the 13-item version were explored. The scale’s three sub-dimensions were also evaluated.
Results: A 12-item version of the scale demonstrated the best fit to the Rasch model and increased the variance
explained without reducing the separation index. The three sub-dimensions demonstrated good fit but lacked
unidimensionality and person-separation reliability. The Meaningfulness sub-dimension showed better psychometric
properties than the Comprehensibility and Manageability sub-dimensions.
Conclusion: A 12-item version of the Sense of Coherence scale has better psychometric properties than the original
13-item version among persons with morbid obesity. Further studies should explore whether these questionable validity
findings for the 13-item scale generalize to other populations and examine whether including other items from the
longer 29-item version may improve the psychometric properties of an abbreviated Sense of Coherence measure