Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLøchting, Idaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrotle, Margrethen_US
dc.contributor.authorStorheim, Kjerstien_US
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Erik L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarratt, Andrew M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-26T13:52:53Z
dc.date.available2015-02-26T13:52:53Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationLøchting, I., Grotle, M., Storheim,K., Werner, E.L. & Garrat, A.M. (2014). Individualized quality of life in patients with low back pain: reliability and validity of the Patient Generated Index. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(8), 781-787. doi:10.2340/16501977-1826en_US
dc.identifier.issn1650-1977en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1202799en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/2422
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the improved version of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with low back pain. Methods: The PGI was administered to 90 patients attending care in 1 of 6 institutions in Norway and evaluated for reliability and validity. The questionnaire was given out to 61 patients for re-test purposes. Results: The PGI was completed correctly by 80 (88.9%) patients and, of the 61 patients responding to the re-test, 50 (82.0%) completed both surveys correctly. PGI scores were approximately normally distributed, with a median of 40 (range 80), where 100 is the best possible quality of life. There were no floor or ceiling effects. The 5 most frequently listed areas affecting quality of life were pain, sleep, stiffness, socializing and housework. The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.73. The smallest detectable changes for individual and group purposes were 32.8 and 4.6, respectively. The correlations between PGI scores and other instrument scores followed a priori hypotheses of low to moderate correlations. Discussion: The PGI has evidence for reliability and validity in Norwegian patients with low back pain at the group level and may be considered for application in intervention studies when a comprehensive evaluation of quality of life is important. However, the smallest detectable change, of approximately 30 points, may be considered too large for individual purposes in clinical applicationsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFoundation for Rehabilitation Informationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine;46(8)en_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectLow back painen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleIndividualized quality of life in patients with low back pain: reliability and validity of the Patient Generated Indexen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1826


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel