Self-reported therapeutic style in occupational therapy students
Journal article, Peer reviewed
© the college of occupational therapist ltd.
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/1783Utgivelsesdato
2013Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Originalversjon
Bonsaksen, T. (2013). Self-reported therapeutic style in occupational therapy students. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(11), 496-502 . doi: 10.4276/030802213X13833255804595 http://dx.doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13833255804595Sammendrag
Introduction: The client-therapist relationship has long been viewed as important
for both the process and outcomes of occupational therapy. The recently developed
Intentional Relationship Model introduced six therapeutic modes as different
ways of relating to clients. Increasing students’ awareness of modes, and
increasing their skills in using them flexibly, has the potential of improving their
subsequent practice as occupational therapists. This article aims to describe
occupational therapy students’ affiliation with the therapeutic modes in a variety
of hypothesized practice situations. In addition, relationships between the students’
affiliation with the different modes are explored. Method: The study had a cross-sectional design. Data were collected from
31 occupational therapy students in Norway, using the Self-Assessment of Modes
Questionnaire. Descriptive analyses, repeated measures ANOVA tests, and correlation
analyses were employed in the analytic procedures.
Findings: The students identified the problem-solving mode to be their most
preferred way of relating to clients, whereas the advocating mode was the
least preferred. High affiliation with the problem-solving mode was significantly
associated with low affiliation with the collaborating mode. Conclusion: Several limitations indicate that caution should be taken when
comparing this study with previous research. Nonetheless, differences between
the results of this study and previous work on the therapeutic modes are of
interest. Possible explanations for differences are discussed, as are implications
for practice and research.