Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMeier, Margrit R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Andrew H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGard, Steven A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcFadyen, Angus K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-09T08:46:36Z
dc.date.available2013-08-09T08:46:36Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationMeier, M. R., Hansen, A. H., Gard, S. A., & McFadyen, A. K. (2012). Obstacle course: Users’ maneuverability and movement efficiency when using Otto Bock C-Leg, Otto Bock 3R60, and CaTech SNS prosthetic knee joints. Journal of rehabilitation research research & development, 49, 583-596.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0748-7711en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 866460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/1554
dc.description.abstractThe performance and movement efficiency of prosthesis users while traversing a multisectional obstacle course (OC) were evaluated using a crossover design with random allocation of three prosthetic knee joints: the SNS (CaTech; Dayton, Ohio) the C-Leg (Otto Bock; Duderstadt, Germany), and the 3R60 (Otto Bock). Twelve users completed the OC twice with each joint, once without and once with a mental loading task (MLT). The performance was objectively assessed using time measurement from digital video recordings, and the Total Heart Beat Index was used to estimate movement efficiency. A 1 mo familiarization period was provided for each knee joint before data collection. It took longer to complete the OC with the 3R60 compared with either the SNS or the C-Leg. No significant time differences were found between the C-Leg and the SNS, but differences between the 3R60 and the SNS (slalom and rock sections) and between the 3R60 and the C-Leg (rock section) were observed. Within the simulated sand section, two participants fell with the C-Leg, one with the 3R60, and none with the SNS. Movement efficiency without MLT was similar between all joints, but with an MLT a significant decrease in movement efficiency was observed with the C-Leg. Previous experience using an SNS had no influence on the results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherU.S. Department of Veterans Affairsen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.subject3R60en_US
dc.subjectC-Legen_US
dc.subjectManeuverabilityen_US
dc.subjectMental loading tasken_US
dc.subjectMovement efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectObstacle courseen_US
dc.subjectProsthetic knee jointen_US
dc.subjectSNSen_US
dc.subjectTotal heart beat indexen_US
dc.subjectWalkingen_US
dc.titleObstacle course: Users’ maneuverability and movement efficiency when using Otto Bock C-Leg, Otto Bock 3R60, and CaTech SNS prosthetic knee jointsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.05.0094


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel