Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSaastad, Eli
dc.contributor.authorWinje, Brita Askeland
dc.contributor.authorStray-Pedersen, Babill
dc.contributor.authorFrøen, Jahn Frederik
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-18T08:53:13Z
dc.date.available2012-01-18T08:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationSaastad, E., Winje, B.A., Stray-Pedersen, B., Frøen, J.F.A. (2011). Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes - a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial. PloS ONE, 6(12): e28482en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 874331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/1032
dc.description.abstractBackground Fetal movement counting is a method used by the mother to quantify her baby's movements, and may prevent adverse pregnancy outcome by a timely evaluation of fetal health when the woman reports decreased fetal movements. We aimed to assess effects of fetal movement counting on identification of fetal pathology and pregnancy outcome. Methodology In a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial, 1076 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies from an unselected population were assigned to either perform fetal movement counting from gestational week 28, or to receive standard antenatal care not including fetal movement counting (controls). Women were recruited from nine Norwegian hospitals during September 2007 through November 2009. Main outcome was a compound measure of fetal pathology and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Analysis was performed by intention-to-treat. Principal Findings The frequency of the main outcome was equal in the groups; 63 of 433 (11.6%) in the intervention group, versus 53 of 532 (10.7%) in the control group [RR: 1.1 95% CI 0.7–1.5)]. The growth-restricted fetuses were more often identified prior to birth in the intervention group than in the control group; 20 of 23 fetuses (87.0%) versus 12 of 20 fetuses (60.0%), respectively, [RR: 1.5 (95% CI 1.0–2.1)]. In the intervention group two babies (0.4%) had Apgar scores <4 at 1 minute, versus 12 (2.3%) in the control group [RR: 0.2 (95% CI 0.04–0.7)]. The frequency of consultations for decreased fetal movement was 71 (13.1%) and 57 (10.7%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively [RR: 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7)]. The frequency of interventions was similar in the groups. Conclusions Maternal ability to detect clinically important changes in fetal activity seemed to be improved by fetal movement counting; there was an increased identification of fetal growth restriction and improved perinatal outcome, without inducing more consultations or obstetric interventionsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPloS ONEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPloS ONE;6(12)
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Gynekologi og obstetrikk: 756en_US
dc.subjectFosterbevegelseren_US
dc.subjectSvangerskapen_US
dc.subjectFosterutviklingen_US
dc.titleFetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes - a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028482


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel