Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBang, Nina
dc.contributor.authorPettersen, Johanne Hagen
dc.contributor.authorNesset, Merete Berg
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorDahl, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorTesli, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorBell, Christina
dc.contributor.authorVaskinn, Anja
dc.contributor.authorFischer-Vieler, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFriestad, Christine
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Ole A.
dc.contributor.authorJönsson, Erik Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorElvsåshagen, Torbjørn
dc.contributor.authorHaukvik, Unn Kristin Hansen
dc.contributor.authorMoberget, Torgeir
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:07:25Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:07:25Z
dc.date.created2025-02-18T14:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationSchizophrenia Bulletin Open. 2024, 6 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2632-7899
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3181346
dc.description.abstractThere is a pressing need for biomarkers of violent behavior risk in psychosis. Previous research indicates that electrophysiological measures of automatic defensive reactions may have potential. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between violent behavior in individuals with and without psychosis and electromyography (EMG) and electroencephalography (EEG) responses to startling auditory stimuli. Electromyography and EEG were recorded during an auditory startle paradigm from healthy controls (HC, n = 211), individuals with psychosis and a history of violent behavior (violent-PSY, n = 18), individuals with psychosis without a history of violence (nonviolent-PSY, n = 32), and individuals with a history of violence without psychosis (violent non-PSY, n = 22). We estimated the auditory startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) using EMG (ie, EMGASR and EMGPPI) and the auditory-evoked potential (ie, AEPASR and AEPPPI) of the EEG. There were no signifcant effects of group on the EMGASR (P = .10) or the 30-, 60-, and 120-ms prepulse + pulse EMGPPI amplitudes (P = .11, P = .19, and P = .50, respectively). The N1 amplitude of the AEPASR was reduced in the violent-PSY group (P < .001) and the nonviolent-PSY group (P = .015) compared with HC. The P2 amplitude of the AEPASR was reduced in violent-PSY relative to nonviolent-PSY (P = .003), violent non-PSY (P = .016), and HC (P < .001). Together, these results show that EEG-based neural responses to startling auditory stimuli are promising biomarkers of violence risk in psychosis.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Startle Response and Prepulse Inhibition in Psychosis and Violence: A Combined Electromyography and Electroencephalography Studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae031
dc.identifier.cristin2360196
dc.source.journalSchizophrenia Bulletin Openen_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal