Outpatient labor induction—Exploring future potential by assessing eligibility in a historical cohort
Marsdal, Kjersti Engen; Sørbye, Ingvil Krarup; Bernitz, Stine; Sve, Ranveig Elise Tulluan; Ask, Kristine; Lukasse, Mirjam
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version

View/ Open
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2024, 103 (6), 1101-1111. 10.1111/aogs.14799Abstract
Introduction: Labor induction rates have increased over the last decades, and in many high-income countries, more than one in four labors are induced. Outpatient man- agement of labor induction has been suggested in low-risk pregnancies to improve women's birth experiences while also promoting a more efficient use of healthcare resources. The primary aim of this paper was to assess the proportion of women in a historical cohort that would have been eligible for outpatient labor induction with oral misoprostol. Second, we wanted to report safety outcomes and assess efficacy out- comes for mothers and infants in pregnancies that met the criteria for outpatient care. Material and methods: Criteria for outpatient labor induction with oral misoprostol were applied to a historical cohort of women with induction of labor at two Norwegian tertiary hospitals in the period January 1, through July 31, 2021. The criteria included low-risk women with an unscarred uterus expecting a healthy, singleton baby in ce- phalic position at term. The primary outcome was the proportion of women eligible for outpatient labor induction. Secondary outcomes included reasons for ineligibility and, for eligible women, safety and efficacy outcomes. Results: Overall, 29.7% of the 1320 women who underwent labor induction in a sin- gleton term pregnancy met the criteria for outpatient labor induction. We identified two serious adverse events that potentially could have occurred outside the hospital if the women had received outpatient care. The mean duration from initiation of labor induction to administration of the last misoprostol was 22.4 h. One in 14 multiparous women gave birth within 3 h after the last misoprostol dose. Conclusions: In this historical cohort, three in ten women met the criteria for outpa- tient management of labor induction with oral misoprostol. Serious adverse events were rare. The average time span from the initiation of labor induction to the last misoprostol was nearly 24 h. This suggests a potential for low-risk women with an induced labor to spend a substantial period of time at home before labor onset.