Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLøvstad, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorBorgen, Ida Maria Henriksen
dc.contributor.authorHauger, Solveig
dc.contributor.authorKleffelgård, Ingerid
dc.contributor.authorBrunborg, Cathrine
dc.contributor.authorRøe, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorSøberg, Helene L.
dc.contributor.authorForslund, Marit Vindal
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T09:06:48Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T09:06:48Z
dc.date.created2024-09-30T14:23:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationBMC Neurology. 2024, 24 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2377
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3174432
dc.description.abstractBackground Family members are often affected by the long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury, but are rarely involved in rehabilitation programs in the chronic phase. We thus do not know what family members´ main concerns are in the chronic phase, what factors are associated with perceived caregiver burden, and whether family members´ health and functioning improves due to rehabilitation efforts received by the patients. This study explored family-members` functioning, predictors of caregiver burden and effect for family members of a goal-oriented intervention in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury. Methods Family members self-reported data measuring their caregiver burden, depression, general health, loneliness, and their evaluation of patient competency in everyday life, patient awareness levels, main problem areas (target outcomes) for the patient related to the brain injury, and demographic data were collected. Regression models were used to explore predictors of caregiver burden, and mixed models analysis was used to explore treatment effects. Results In total, 73 family members were included, 39 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group. Moderate to high caregiver burden was reported by 40% of family members, and 16% experienced clinical levels of depression. Family member loneliness and their evaluation of the patient`s level of functional competency explained 57% of the variability in caregiver burden. There were no treatment-related changes in caregiver burden, family member depression or general health. At T2 there was however a significant reduction in how family members rated severity of target outcomes that the family members had nominated at baseline (-0.38, 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.02, p = 0.04), but not for the target outcomes the patients had nominated. Conclusions A significant proportion of family members to patients in the chronic phase of TBI continue to experience challenging caregiver burden and emotional symptoms. Both family member-related and patient factors contribute to caregiver burden. Interventions targeting patient complaints do not automatically alleviate family members´ burden. It is important to address social support for family members early after injury, and there is a need for more interventions specifically targeting family members´ needs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleFamily member reported symptom burden, predictors of caregiver burden and treatment effects in a goal-oriented community-based randomized controlled trial in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injuryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12883-024-03841-7
dc.identifier.cristin2306883
dc.source.journalBMC Neurologyen_US
dc.source.volume24en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal