Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenjum, Sigrun
dc.contributor.authorRosendahl-Riise, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorMorseth, Marianne S.
dc.contributor.authorHevrøy, Thyra J.
dc.contributor.authorHjartåker, Anette
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Ingunn M.S.
dc.contributor.authorAakre, Inger
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T09:32:38Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T09:32:38Z
dc.date.created2025-01-14T09:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationNorsk tidsskrift for ernæring (NTFE). 2024, 22 (4), 179-188.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1503-5034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3172740
dc.description.abstractBackground: Older persons are vulnerable to malnutrition and inadequate micronutrient intake, including iodine deficiency. Objectives: To assess urinary iodine concentration (UIC) and dietary iodine intake in a group of community-dwelling older persons receiving home care services in Oslo. Method: One spot urine sample and two 24-hour dietary recalls were collected in 60 community-dwelling older persons (34 women and 26 men). UIC was analyzed by the Sandell-Kolthoff reaction and dietary iodine intake was calculated and compared to the provisional Average Requirement (AR). Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to find predictors for iodine intake. Results: The median UIC (p25-p75) was 102 (64–168) μg/L and dietary iodine intake was 104 (69–173) μg/day. In total, 58% had iodine intakes below provisional AR. The main source of iodine was milk and dairy products, accounting for 42% of total iodine intake. In multiple linear regression analyses, iodine supplement use and oral supplement use were largely associated with iodine intake, (β, 95 % CI): 132 (76, 187) and 92 (23, 187), respectively. Increasing number of meals (β, 95 % CI): 48 (9, 86) and older age 2 (0, 4) was also associated with iodine intake. Conclusions: Iodine status was found to be adequate at the group level, however, median iodine intake was below provisional AR. We found that the number of meals and total energy intake directly influenced iodine status. Most of the older persons consumed iodine-rich food items, thus the largest risk was not limited intake of iodine-rich food sources but limited energy intake.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIodine nutrition in Community-dwelling Older Persons from Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18261/ntfe.22.4.2
dc.identifier.cristin2340498
dc.source.journalNorsk tidsskrift for ernæring (NTFE)en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.source.pagenumber179-188en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal