Group Recommendation Systems Based On Pairwise Preference Data And User Contribution
Abstract
Users’ contributions play a critical role in shaping the trajectory of group decision-making processes, exerting a significant influence on the overall dynamics and out-comes of collaborative efforts. Actively engaging in discussions and sharing theirideas, viewpoints, and preferences, users contribute diverse perspectives that enrichthe collective deliberation and ultimately enhance the effectiveness of decision-makingprocesses. Recognizing the profound impact of individual contributions, this paperintroduces a pioneering approach for group recommendation systems grounded incooperative game theory. Specifically, the proposed methodologies harness the prin-ciples of Wonderful Life Utility (WLU) and Shapley Value (ShV) to quantitatively eval-uate the input of each group member in the decision-making process. By systemat-ically assessing the contributions of users within the group, these techniques aim tofoster a more equitable and inclusive decision-making environment, where individualpreferences are duly acknowledged and integrated into the collective decision-makingprocess. This innovative approach represents a significant advancement in the field ofGRS, offering a nuanced understanding of the role of user contributions and provid-ing a robust framework for facilitating collaborative decision-making in diverse groupsettings. This method is designed with the primary objective of improving the ac-curacy and fairness of group recommendations within collaborative settings, with aparticular emphasis on the significance of individual preferences. To evaluate its ef-fectiveness across a range of group configurations, two distinct datasets—the fooddataset and the car dataset—were employed for validation purposes. Random andGcPp clustered groups were formed for each dataset, allowing for a comprehensiveassessment of the proposed techniques under different scenarios. The experimentalresults obtained from these evaluations demonstrate the robustness and efficacy of thesystem, as it consistently delivers highly accurate and equitable group recommenda-tions across diverse group configurations. These findings highlight the versatility andadaptability of the proposed approach, indicating its potential applicability in a widearray of collaborative contexts. Overall, this study contributes a novel perspective tothe field of Group Recommendation Systems (GRS), shedding light on the critical roleplayed by personal preferences in driving meaningful and impactful group decisions.