Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThørrisen, Mikkel Magnus
dc.contributor.authorSadeghi, Talieh
dc.contributor.authorWiers-Jenssen, Jannecke
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-07T15:27:06Z
dc.date.available2021-10-07T15:27:06Z
dc.date.created2021-07-14T22:33:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-11
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2788458
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a validated brief instrument measuring the five-factor model (FFM) personality dimensions, developed for instances where more comprehensive FFM instruments are impractical to use. The TIPI has been translated into several languages, but psychometric properties of the Norwegian version (N-TIPI) have not been systematically explored. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the N-TIPI, in terms of internal consistency and structural validity. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, responses on the N-TIPI were collected from 5,009 Norwegian master graduates. Descriptive statistics for the subscales and correlations between subscales were calculated. Internal consistency was assessed with inter-item correlations, Cronbach’s α and Spearman-Brown coefficients. Structural validity was explored with principal component analysis, parallel analysis, and visual scree plot inspection. Results for the N-TIPI were compared with those previously reported for the original TIPI as well as the German, French, Spanish, and Portuguese versions. Results: Compared with the original and non-English versions of TIPI, results for N-TIPI showed comparable subscale rank order of means, standard deviations, and pattern of correlations between subscales, as well as inter-item correlations and Cronbach’s α. The 10 N-TIPI items were adequately reduced to five components, theoretically corresponding with the FFM personality domains. Conclusion: The N-TIPI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and satisfactory structural validity. Although further research is warranted, the instrument stands out as feasible when it is essential to minimize participants’ response burden in studies that aim to explore personality as one among several concepts or utilize personality traits as covariates.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Psychology;August 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 723852
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectFive-factor modelsen_US
dc.subjectInternal consistenciesen_US
dc.subjectPersonality assessmentsen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.subjectStructural validityen_US
dc.subjectTen-item personality inventoriesen_US
dc.titleInternal consistency and structural validity of the Norwegian translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (N-TIPI)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2021 Thørrisen, Sadeghi and Wiers-Jenssen.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber723852en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852
dc.identifier.cristin1921797
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-9en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal