Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lotte Cathrin
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T11:45:20Z
dc.date.available2021-09-24T11:45:20Z
dc.date.created2021-06-02T12:50:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-13
dc.identifier.citationThe British Journal of Social Work. 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-3102
dc.identifier.issn1468-263X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2781423
dc.description.abstractIn this article, the ‘evidence–relevance’ dilemma in the ‘knowledge for social work’ debate is approached empirically, departing from a concrete practice observed amongst social workers managing police-reported child abuse cases within the Norwegian Barnahus model (children’s house model). This practice can be conceptualised as interstitial work and is noted as providing children who are victims of abuse with holistic and context-sensitive interventions relevant to their particular situations and needs. The relevant questions addressed are what knowledge sources are used and how is knowledge applied in practice by social workers who are able to provide their clients with relevant interventions. Based on the findings and drawing on Flyvbjerg’s approach to phronetic knowledge, it is argued that for social work practice to result in knowledge-based and relevant interventions that account for the complex nature of social problems and social work reality, the use of formal knowledge sources and evidence must be ‘phronetically guided’en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study received funding from OsloMet — Oslo Metropolitan University.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe British Journal of Social Work;
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBarnahusen_US
dc.subjectChildren’s housesen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based practicesen_US
dc.subjectInterstitial worken_US
dc.subjectPhronesisen_US
dc.subjectPhronetically guidingen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge usesen_US
dc.titlePhronetically Guided Use of Knowledge: Interstitial Work at Barnahus and How It Can Inform the Knowledge Debate in Social Worken_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab081
dc.identifier.cristin1913279
dc.source.journalThe British Journal of Social Worken_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-17en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal