Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGolombek, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorGreaker, Mads
dc.contributor.authorHoel, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T12:52:58Z
dc.date.available2021-05-27T12:52:58Z
dc.date.created2021-02-15T15:59:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-05
dc.identifier.citationResource and Energy Economics. 2020, 60, (1-12).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0928-7655
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756691
dc.description.abstractAn innovator may not be able to capture the full social benefit of her innovation and, therefore, governments support private R&D through various measures. We compare a market good innovation—to develop a more efficient technology to produce a standard market good—with an environmental innovation—to develop a more efficient abatement technology—that has the same potential to increase the social surplus. In the first-best outcome, which can be achieved by offering an R&D subsidy and a diffusion subsidy, the R&D subsidy should be greatest for an environmental innovation, whereas the diffusion subsidy should be greatest for a market good innovation. The ranking of the two types of subsidies reflects that the appropriability problem is greater for an environmental innovation than for a market good innovation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResource and Energy Economics;volume 60
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectR&Den_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental R&Den_US
dc.subjectInnovationsen_US
dc.subjectEndogenous technological changesen_US
dc.subjectInnovation prizesen_US
dc.subjectDiffusion subsidyen_US
dc.titleShould environmental R&D be prioritized?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber101132en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101132
dc.identifier.cristin1890040
dc.source.journalResource and Energy Economicsen_US
dc.source.volume60en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 209698en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/308481en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal