Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSveen, Unni
dc.contributor.authorGuldager, Rikke
dc.contributor.authorSøberg, Helene Lundgaard
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Tone Alm
dc.contributor.authorEgerod, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorPoulsen, Ingrid
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-31T10:43:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T17:30:41Z
dc.date.available2021-01-31T10:43:24Z
dc.date.available2021-03-08T17:30:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-13
dc.identifier.citationSveen, Guldager, Søberg, Andreassen, Egerod, Poulsen. Rehabilitation interventions after traumatic brain injury: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2020:1-9en
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288
dc.identifier.issn1464-5165
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/9928
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To (1) identify interventional research topics in traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation, (2) describe potential knowledge gaps, and (3) uncover further needs for interventional TBI rehabilitation research for patients and families. Method: We searched three databases (2006–2019) and screened 1552 non-duplicate articles. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, yielding 754 articles for full-text review. Of these, 425 were included, as relevant to the purpose of the scoping review. Findings: Among articles on TBI rehabilitation, the majority (71.8%) applied quantitative methodology; of these only 19.7% were randomized controlled trials. Severe TBI was described more often than mild/moderate TBI populations. Hospital vs community/home rehabilitation was 55.1% vs 37.2%; rehabilitation at workplace/school was described in only 4.5% articles, while in 7.2% the setting was undisclosed. Of 83 articles describing work/education, only 14 were in a work/school context. An additional focus in the work/education articles was activities of daily living (n = 28), cognition (n = 33) and emotions (n = 23), few targeted family or network. Conclusion: The main attention of interventional TBI rehabilitation studies has been on severe TBI and long-term rehabilitation. Gaps identified were rehabilitation of mild/moderate TBI populations, older populations, acute/sub-phase rehabilitation, return to work issues and studies including the family.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe project was supported by funding from the Norwegian Research Council (project number 229082). The project is also part of the Danish-Norwegian collaboration linked to and partly financed by the “Phlegethon network.”en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDisability and Rehabilitation; Volume 44, 2022 - Issue 4
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectTraumatic brain injuriesen
dc.subjectRehabilitationen
dc.subjectInterventionsen
dc.subjectScopesen
dc.subjectRehabilitation settingsen
dc.titleRehabilitation interventions after traumatic brain injury: a scoping reviewen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2021-01-31T10:43:24Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1773940
dc.identifier.cristin1819309
dc.source.journalDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 229082


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)