dc.contributor.author | Carr, James E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Luke, Molli M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Arntzen, Erik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-17T12:01:54Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-26T10:42:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-17T12:01:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-26T10:42:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-04-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Carr, J.E., Luke, M.M. & Arntzen, E. (2020). On recent attempts to rebrand “behavior analysis” as “behavior science”. European Journal of Behavior Analysis (EJOBA), 21(1), 20-25. doi:• https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2019.1611130 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-1149 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-1149 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2377-729X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/9440 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, behavior analysts have increasingly used the term behavior science to describe the discipline behavior analysis. These “rebranding” efforts have not been concentrated in any particular domain of behavior analysis and appear to be decentralized in nature. We analyze the possible reasons for using this alternative term and describe some difficulties associated with this practice, such as the already extensive use of behavior science to describe a family of social sciences and the widespread development that has occurred under behavior analysis. We conclude the commentary by proposing several variables for behavior analysts to consider before using an alternative term to describe our discipline. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | European Journal of Behavior Analysis (EJOBA);Volume 21, 2020 - Issue 1 | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons CAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Kognitiv psykologi: 267 | en |
dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Utviklingspsykologi: 265 | en |
dc.subject | Behavior analyses | en |
dc.subject | Behavior science | en |
dc.subject | Dissemination | en |
dc.subject | Verbal behavior | en |
dc.subject | Atferdsanalyse | en |
dc.subject | Verbal atferd | en |
dc.subject | Atferdsvitenskap | en |
dc.subject | Utbredelse | en |
dc.title | On recent attempts to rebrand “behavior analysis” as “behavior science” | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2020-10-17T12:01:54Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2019.1611130 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1830114 | |
dc.source.journal | European Journal of Behavior Analysis (EJOBA) | |