Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMussmann, Bo
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorBensen, Anne Soon
dc.contributor.authorTorfing, Trine
dc.contributor.authorOvesen, Ole
dc.contributor.authorOvergaard, Søren
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-07T12:02:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-27T12:03:12Z
dc.date.available2020-02-07T12:02:00Z
dc.date.available2020-02-27T12:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-03
dc.identifier.citationMussmann B, Jensen, Bensen, Torfing, Ovesen, Overgaard. Radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion using a low-dose slot-scanning radiographic system (EOS®). Radiography. 2019;55:e53-e57en
dc.identifier.issn1078-8174
dc.identifier.issn1078-8174
dc.identifier.issn1532-2831
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/8184
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Acetabular retroversion is assessed using pelvic X-ray. Cross-over-sign (COS), posterior-wall-sign (PWS) and ischial-spine-sign (ISS) are important radiographic signs of the condition. The pelvic area is sensitive to radiation and thus, possibilities to reduce dose should be considered. The purpose was to compare radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion on conventional pelvic anteroposterior (AP) X-rays with a low-dose slot-scanning system (EOS) in a sample of patients with retroversion of the acetabulum and to compare the radiation doses. Methods: 34 participants with radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion in one or both hips on conventional pelvic X-ray were consecutively recruited. Pelvic EOS-images were acquired in each patient and COS, PWS, ISS, COS-ratio and PWS-ratio was assessed. Radiation dose comparison of X-ray vs. EOS was performed using Dose-Area Products. Results: Retroversion was present in 57 out of 68 hips. The absolute agreement was 91%, 84% and 76% for COS, PWS and ISS, respectively. No statistically significant differences were present between COS-ratio and PWS-ratio in either modality and Bland–Altman limits of agreement were narrow. The mean radiation dose was 1053 mGy*cm2 in X-ray and 593 mGy*cm2 in EOS (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The results indicate that pelvic EOS provides diagnostic qualities similar to conventional X-ray using 44% less radiation when radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion are assessed.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRadiography;Volume 25, Issue 3, August 2019
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectX-raysen
dc.subjectLow dose radiographic systemsen
dc.subjectHipsen
dc.subjectRetroversionen
dc.subjectPelvesen
dc.subjectAgreementsen
dc.titleRadiographic signs of acetabular retroversion using a low-dose slot-scanning radiographic system (EOS®)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-02-07T12:02:00Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.subject.hrcsMuskulatur og skjelett: Påvising, screening og diagnose
dc.subject.hrcsMusculoskeletal : Detection, Screening and Diagnosis
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.001
dc.identifier.cristin1756254
dc.source.journalRadiography


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/