Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMausehund, Lasse
dc.contributor.authorSkard, Audun Eithun
dc.contributor.authorKrosshaug, Tron
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T08:16:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T09:30:59Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T08:16:45Z
dc.date.available2019-06-12T09:30:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-01
dc.identifier.citationMausehund L, Skard AE, Krosshaug T. Muscle Activation in Unilateral Barbell Exercises: Implications for Strength Training and Rehabilitation. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018en
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.issn1533-4287
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/7206
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present investigation was to assess lower-body muscle activity and hamstrings-to-quadriceps (HQ) activation ratios during performance of the split squat (SS), single-leg squat (SLS), and rear foot elevated split squat (RFESS), while using the same relative load and performing the exercises to muscular failure. Eleven healthy, moderately strength-trained subjects performed a 6–8 repetition maximum set of each exercise while electromyographic (EMG) activity of the vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, and gluteus medius was recorded. The results show that there were no significant differences in EMG peak activity of the gluteus maximus and vastus lateralis between any of the exercises. Gluteus medius activation was significantly (p # 0.05) higher during the SLS (81.9% maximum voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]), compared with the RFESS (54.9% MVIC) and SS (46.2% MVIC). The RFESS elicited higher (p # 0.05) biceps femoris activity (76.1% MVIC) than the SS (62.3% MVIC), as well as higher (p # 0.05) HQ activation ratios (0.83) than the SS (0.69) and SLS (0.63). During the SLS and the SS, HQ activation ratios increased significantly in the course of the repetition maximum set. In conclusion, although absolute loading differs between exercises, similar training stimuli of the gluteus maximus and quadriceps femoris can be expected for all exercises. The SLS is likely to induce the greatest improvements in gluteus medius strength, whereas the RFESS should be preferred if high hamstring coactivation is desired. To improve validity in EMG studies, strength training exercises should be performed close to failure while using the same relative loading.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research;Epub ahead of print
dc.relation.urihttps://www.klokavskade.no/globalassets/publications/mausehund_2018_nscr_muscle-activiation-in-unilateral-barbell-exercises.pdf
dc.subjectElectromyographiesen
dc.subjectSplit squaten
dc.subjectSingle leg squaten
dc.subjectBulgarian lungesen
dc.titleMuscle Activation in Unilateral Barbell Exercises: Implications for Strength Training and Rehabilitationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2019-06-11T08:16:45Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002617
dc.identifier.cristin1615768
dc.source.journalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel