Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorvik, Karin
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorSaltvedt, Ingvild
dc.contributor.authorHølen, Jacob Christian
dc.contributor.authorFayers, Peter
dc.contributor.authorRustøen, Tone
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-17T13:48:11Z
dc.date.available2011-02-17T13:48:11Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-20
dc.identifier.citationTorvik, K., Kaasa, S., Kirkevold, Ø., Saltvedt, I., Hølen, J.K., Fayers, P. & Rustøen, T. (2010). Validation of Doloplus-2 among nonverbal nursing home patients : an evaluation of Doloplus-2 in a clinical setting. BMC Geriatrics, 10 (9)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/586
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pain measurement in nonverbal older adults is best based on behavioural observation, e.g. using an observational measurement tool such as Doloplus-2. The purposes of this study were to examine the use of Doloplus-2 in a nonverbal nursing home population, and to evaluate its reliability and validity by comparing registered nurses’ estimation of pain with Doloplus-2 scores. Method: In this cross-sectional study, Doloplus-2 was used to observe the pain behaviour of patients aged above 65 years who were unable to self-report their pain. Nurses also recorded their perceptions of patient pain (yes, no, don’t know) before they used Doloplus-2. Data on demographics, medical diagnoses, and prescribed pain treatment were collected from patient records. Daily life functioning was measured and participants were screened using the Mini Mental State Examination. Results: In total, 77 nursing home patients were included, 75% were women and the mean age was 86 years (SD 6.6, range 68-100). Over 50% were dependent on nursing care to a high or a medium degree, and all were severely cognitively impaired. The percentage of zero scores on Doloplus-2 ranged from 17% (somatic reactions) to 40% (psychosocial reactions). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.71 for the total scale. In total, 52% of the patients were judged by nurses to be experiencing pain, compared with 68% when using Doloplus-2 (p = 0.01). For 29% of the sample, nurses were unable to report if the patients were in pain. Conclusions: In the present study, more patients were categorized as having pain while using Doloplus-2 compared with nurses’ estimation of pain without using any tools. The fact that nurses could not report if the patients were in pain in one third of the patients supports the claim that Doloplus-2 is a useful supplement for estimating pain in this population. However, nurses must use their clinical experience in addition to the use of Doloplus-2, as behaviour can have different meaning for different patients. Further research is still needed about the use of Doloplus-2 in patients not able to self-report their pain.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC Geriatrics;10 (9)
dc.subjectDoloplus-2en_US
dc.subjectGeriatricsen_US
dc.subjectPain measurementen_US
dc.subjectNonverbal pasientsen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Geriatri: 778en_US
dc.titleValidation of Doloplus-2 among nonverbal nursing home patients : an evaluation of Doloplus-2 in a clinical settingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-9


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record