Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRostad, Hanne Marie
dc.contributor.authorUtne, Inger
dc.contributor.authorGrov, Ellen Karine
dc.contributor.authorPuts, Martine
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsrud, Liv
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T12:34:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16T14:09:54Z
dc.date.available2017-11-13T12:34:35Z
dc.date.available2018-01-16T14:09:54Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationRostad HM, Utne I, Grov EK, Puts M, Halvorsrud L. Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 2017en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/5486
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Doloplus-2 is a pain assessment scale for assessing pain in older adults with cognitive impairment. It is used in clinical practice and research. However, evidence for its measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility remain incomplete. This systematic review synthesizes previous research on the measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the scale. Method: We conducted a systematic search in three databases (CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO) for studies published in English, French, German, Dutch/Flemish or a Scandinavian language between 1990 and April 2017. We also reviewed the Doloplus-2 homepage and reference lists of included studies to supplement our search. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts and performed the quality assessment and data abstraction. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in this systematic review. The quality of the studies varied, but many lacked sufficient detail about the samples and response rates. The Doloplus-2 has been studied using diverse samples in a variety of settings; most study participants were in long-term care and in people with dementia. Sixteen studies addressed various aspects of the scale ’ s feasibility and clinical utility, but their results are limited and inconsistent across settings and samples. Support for the scale ’ s reliability, validity and responsiveness varied widely across the studies. Generally, the reliability coefficients reached acceptable benchmarks, but the evidence for different aspects of the scale ’ s validity and responsiveness was incomplete. Conclusion: Additional high-quality studies are warranted to determine in which populations of older adults with cognitive impairment the Doloplus-2 is reliable, valid and feasible. The ability of the Doloplus-2 to meaningfully quantify pain, measure treatment response and improve patient outcomes also needs further investigation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCognitive impairmenten
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectDoloplus-2en
dc.subjectPainen
dc.subjectOlder adultsen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen
dc.titleMeasurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic reviewen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2017-11-13T12:34:35Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0643-9
dc.identifier.cristin1513497
dc.source.journalBMC Geriatrics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). 2017
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.