Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEikeseth, Svein
dc.contributor.authorBrath, Knut-Aleksander Sæther
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-26T10:24:01Z
dc.date.available2015-11-26T10:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/2856
dc.descriptionMaster i læring i komplekse systemeren_US
dc.description.abstractFunctional behavioral assessments (FBA) provide a structured and reliable measure of environmental contingencies maintaining problem behavior. It has been used to assess problem behaviors in animals, children, and individuals with disabilities and within organizations. The methods popularity is growing and it is frequently used in U.S schools since Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was established. With this comes some particular challenges in meeting a broader group of professionals with different exposure to behavior analytic theory. These papers seek to elaborate on the different categories of FBAs and to suggest previously proven refinements that suit different contexts and behaviors. The review article enlightens some ongoing theoretical and empirical discussions within the field, and comments on current recommendations for best practice. The empirical paper compares the accuracy between structured ABC form and narrative ABC forms, when used by undergraduate students. The findings are modest with non-significant differences and a show a slight preference for using narrative ABC forms.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHøgskolen i Oslo og Akershusen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMALKS;2015
dc.subjectFunctional behavioral assessmenten_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.subjectFunctional analysisen_US
dc.subjectStructured ABC formen_US
dc.subjectNarrative ABC formen_US
dc.subjectTopographiesen_US
dc.subjectProblem behavioren_US
dc.titleFunctional behavioral assessmenten_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record