• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for helsevitenskap (HV)
  • HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for helsevitenskap (HV)
  • HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

What is covered by 'Cancer Rehabilitation' in PubMed? A review of randomized controlled trials 1990-2011

Gudbergsson, SB; Dahl, Alv A; Loge, Jon Håvard; Thorsen, Lene; Oldervoll, Line Merethe; Grov, Ellen Karine
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
Åpne
1201569.pdf (313.2Kb)
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/2470
Utgivelsesdato
2014
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid [1297]
Originalversjon
Gudbergsson, S.B., Dahl, A.A., Loge, J.H., Thorsen, L., Oldervoll, L.M., Grov, E.K. (2014). What is covered by "Cancer Rehabilitation" in PubMed? A review of randomized controlled trials 1990-2011. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(2), 97-106.   http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1902
Sammendrag
Objective: This focused review examines randomized controlled

studies included by the term “cancer rehabilitation”

in PubMed. The research questions concern the type of interventions

performed and their methodological quality.

Design: Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms:

neoplasm AND rehabilitation, all articles with randomized

controlled studies that included adult cancer patients, written

in English, were extracted from PubMed. Papers covering

physical exercise, psychiatric/psychological treatment or

social support only were excluded as they had been reviewed

recently. Abstracts and papers were assessed by 3 pairs of

reviewers, and descriptive information was extracted systematically.

Methodological quality was rated on a 10-item

index scale, and the cut-off for acceptable quality was set at

≥ 8.

Results: A total of 132 (19%) of the 683 identified papers

met the eligibility criteria and were assessed in detail. The

papers were grouped into 5 thematic categories: 44 physical;

15 art and expressive; 47 psycho-educative; 21 emotionally

supportive; and 5 others. Good quality of design was

observed in 32 studies, 18 of them uni-dimensional and 14

multi-dimensional.

Conclusion: Published randomized controlled studies on

cancer rehabilitation are heterogeneous in terms of content

and samples, and are mostly characterized by suboptimal

design quality. Future studies should be more specific and

well-designed with sufficient statistical strength.
Utgiver
Foundation of Rehabilitation Information
Serie
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine;47(2)

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit