Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLundberg, Camilla Stub
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T09:15:12Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T09:15:12Z
dc.date.created2023-01-03T18:47:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0968-7599
dc.identifier.issn1360-0508
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097511
dc.description.abstractFrontline workers engaged in enabling employment and activist entrepreneurs strive to reframe disability as they facilitate work inclusion. They do so in an organisational and societal context that emphasises labour-market participation. Frontline workers facilitate this inclusion when they implement and construct disability employment policies at the street level, while activist entrepreneurs do so when they privilege hiring disabled people. Based on interviews in this study within a Norwegian welfare context, I show how both groups of actors strive to abolish a deficit approach in distinct yet overlapping ways. They do so by framing disabled people in terms of their assets and contributions rather than foregrounding their needs and challenges. While the entrepreneurs brought up ways in which disability can be a central part of identity that should be recognised and talked about, the frontline workers promoted assets in an individualised manner. Nevertheless, the deficit approach is maintained in subtle ways.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleStriving to abolish a deficit approach to disability: frames applied by frontline workers and activist entrepreneurs in employmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeStriving to abolish a deficit approach to disability: frames applied by frontline workers and activist entrepreneurs in employmenten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2160927
dc.identifier.cristin2100035
dc.source.journalDisability & Societyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal