Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Jingxian
dc.contributor.authorTigelaar, Dineke E. H.
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Tian
dc.contributor.authorAdmiraal, Wilfried
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T11:35:48Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T11:35:48Z
dc.date.created2022-12-01T10:40:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2022, first online .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0266-4909
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3081951
dc.description.abstractBackground: The impact of mobile technology usage on student learning in various educational stages has been the subject of ongoing empirical and review research. The most recent meta‐analyses on various types of mobile technology use for poten- tial benefits of learning covered the empirical studies up to about nine years ago. Since then, the use of mobile technology in primary and secondary education has increased tremendously, and numerous empirical studies have been conducted on this topic, but their conclusions were inconsistent. Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review is to re‐examine this issue by meta‐analyzing the empirical research studies from the last nine years, with a focus on cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning outcomes in primary and secondary education, and to examine the potential moderators that may have contributed to the heterogeneity across findings. Methods: Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we found 85 studies of 78 peer‐reviewed papers (N = 9157) from electronic databases and major journals in educational technology and mobile learning between 2014 and 2022. We then exam- ined 15 moderators that were expected to affect student learning outcomes. Results and Conclusions: Compared with traditional technology and non‐technology groups, using mobile technology produced medium positive and statistically signifi- cant effects on primary and secondary students' learning, in terms of cognitive (g = 0.498, 95% CI [0.382, 0.614]), affective (g = 0.449, 95% CI [0.301, 0.598]) and beha- vioural (g = 0.339, 95% CI [0.051, 0.627]) learning outcomes. Further moderator ana- lyses revealed that student factors (i.e., community type, students’ socioeconomic status), learning process (i.e., hardware used, student‐to‐hardware ratio, teaching method) and study quality (i.e., learning topic/content equivalence, degree of tech- nology use in the control group) were among the variables that moderated the sum- mary effect sizes for at least one learning outcome dimension significantly. The findings and their implications for researchers, policymakers and practitioners are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe effects of mobile technology usage on cognitive, affective, and behavioural learning outcomes in primary and secondary education: A systematic review with meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcal.12759
dc.identifier.cristin2086839
dc.source.journalJournal of Computer Assisted Learningen_US
dc.source.volumefirst onlineen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal