Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Erik Egeland
dc.contributor.authorBinde, Christina
dc.contributor.authorLeegaard, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorTonby, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorDyrhol-Riise, Anne Ma
dc.contributor.authorKvale, Dag
dc.contributor.authorAmundsen, Erik Koldberg
dc.contributor.authorHolten, Aleksander Rygh
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-23T10:46:39Z
dc.date.available2022-12-23T10:46:39Z
dc.date.created2022-11-28T12:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationShock. 2022, 58 (4), 251-259.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1073-2322
dc.identifier.issn1540-0514
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039377
dc.description.abstractBackground: Biomarkers for early recognition of infection are warranted. The hypothesis of this study was that calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6 and procalcitonin (PCT), alone or in combination, provide clinically useful information to the clinicians for early identification of infection in patients with possible sepsis in the emergency department (ED). Biomarker dynamics in the first week of hospitalization were explored. Methods: Adult patients in rapid response teams in the ED were included in a prospective observational study (n = 391). Patients who received antibiotics after biomarker availability were excluded. The ED clinician (EDC) decision whether to start antibiotics was registered. Calprotectin, CRP, IL-6, and PCT were analyzed in blood samples drawn within 15 min after ED arrival and in a subgroup for 1 week. Infection likelihood was evaluated post hoc. Results: In identifying patients with infection, CRP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.913) and IL-6 (AUC, 0.895) were superior to calprotectin (AUC, 0.777) and PCT (AUC, 0.838). The best regression model predicting infections included EDC, CRP, and IL-6. Using optimal cutoff values, CRP and IL-6 in combination reached 95% positive and 90% negative predictive values for infection. The EDC undertreated or overtreated 65 of 391 patients (17%), and CRP and IL-6 optimal cutoff values could correct this in 32 of 65 patients (49%). Longitudinal samples revealed that IL-6 peaked in the ED, whereas CRP and PCT peaked later. Conclusion: C-reactive protein and IL-6 were superior to calprotectin and PCT for recognizing infection in patients with possible sepsis in the ED. Combining these two biomarkers with different dynamics improved recognition of infection and could aid clinical management in rapid response teams in the ED.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesShock;Vol. 58, No. 4
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBiomarkersen_US
dc.subjectEmergency medicineen_US
dc.subjectIL-6en_US
dc.subjectInfectionsen_US
dc.subjectLeukocyte L1 antigen complexen_US
dc.subjectSepsisen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy and added value of infection biomarkers in patients with possible sepsis in the emergency departmenten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001981
dc.identifier.cristin2082461
dc.source.journalShocken_US
dc.source.volume58en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.source.pagenumber251-259en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 296517en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal