Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHsu, Yun-Sheng
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Xiaofeng
dc.contributor.authorKraniotis, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorGillott, Mark
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shin-Ku
dc.contributor.authorWood, Christopher J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T13:43:58Z
dc.date.available2022-05-27T13:43:58Z
dc.date.created2022-03-10T20:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-14
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2996522
dc.description.abstractThe novel Pulse technique measures the building airtightness in a dynamic approach, involving a lowpressure pressurisation process, typically in 1-10Pa. It is known that the wind effect is one of the main sources of uncertainty for airtightness testing. The literature review revealed that the wind impact on measuring building airtightness has been explored in relation to the steady pressurisation method (i.e., the blower door), while there is limited research investigating the validity of the Pulse measurement under various natural wind conditions. In this study, in total, 423 Pulse tests were performed to measure the building airtightness of a five-bedroom dwelling located at the University of Nottingham, UK, under natural wind conditions. The viability of the Pulse technique for delivering airtightness measurements under different wind conditions was assessed, including the impacts of the wind speed and the wind direction on the Pulse measurements. Based on the measured air leakage rates, the threshold of maximum wind speed that led the Pulse measurements to have repeatability greater than ±10% is 5.0m/s at 2.2m above ground level (i.e., approximately equivalent to the meteorological wind speed of 7.9m/s). On the other hand, the directional wind study showed that at lower wind speeds, the wind direction has a lesser influence on the Pulse measurement than the wind speed itself. Practically, multiple Pulse tests are recommended for minimising the wind impact on building airtightness measurement when adverse wind conditions are present.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBuilding and Environment;Volume 215, 1 May 2022, 108955
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBygningsfysikken_US
dc.subjectBuilding physicsen_US
dc.subjectBuilding airtightnessen_US
dc.subjectThe Pulse techniqueen_US
dc.subjectUnsteady approachesen_US
dc.subjectWind impactsen_US
dc.subjectWind speeden_US
dc.subjectWind directionsen_US
dc.titleThe impact of wind upon the pulse technique measured airtightness of a detached dwellingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.articlenumber108955en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108955
dc.identifier.cristin2008952
dc.source.journalBuilding and Environmenten_US
dc.source.volume215en_US
dc.source.issue215en_US
dc.source.pagenumber35en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Arkitektur og bygningsteknologi: 531en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Architecture and building technology: 531en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal